Skip to main content

Complete Graphs and Orderings

  • Conference paper
Digital Information Processing and Communications (ICDIPC 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 188))

  • 1064 Accesses

Abstract

Ranking of help functions with respect to their usefulness is in the main focus of this work. In this work a help function is regarded as useful to a student if the student has succeeded to solve a problem after using it. Methods from the theory of partial orderings are further applied facilitating an automated process of suggesting individualised advises on how to proceed in order to solve a particular problem. The decision making process is based on the common assumption that if given a choice between two alternatives, a person will choose one. Thus obtained partial orderings appeared to be all linear orders since each pair of alternatives is compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berg, S.: Condorcet’s Jury Theorem and the Reliability of Majority Voting. Group Decision and Negotiation 5(3), 229–238 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boboila, C., Iordache, G.V., Boboila, M.S.: An Online System for Testing and Evaluation. WSEAS Transactions on advances in Engineering Education 5(1), 20–28 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bogart, K.P.: Some Social Sciences Applications of Ordered Sets. In: Rival, I. (ed.) Ordered Sets, pp. 759–787. Reidel, Dordrecht (1982)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Breuker, J.: Components of Problem Solving and Types of Problems. In: Steels, L., Van de Velde, W., Schreiber, G. (eds.) EKAW 1994. LNCS, vol. 867, pp. 118–136. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. http://www.carnegielearning.com/web_docs/Whitepaper_Edweek.pdf

  6. http://ctat.pact.cs.cmu.edu/

  7. http://www.learning-styles-online.com/overview/

  8. Encheva, S., Tumin, S.: Automated discovering of what is hindering the learning performance of a student. In: Zhou, X., Li, J., Shen, H.T., Kitsuregawa, M., Zhang, Y. (eds.) APWeb 2006. LNCS, vol. 3841, pp. 521–531. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Encheva, S., Tumin, S.: Ordering of Knowledge Spaces. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education 3(10), 895–900 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Encheva, S., Tumin, S.: Uncertainties in Knowledge Assessment. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education 5(4), 895–900 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jan, N., Lin, S.-C., Lin, N.P., Chang, C.: A Trend-based Prediction System for Web User Behavior. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education 5 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keefe, J.W.: Learning Style: An Overview. In: NASSP’s Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Proscribing Programs, pp. 1–17. National Association of Secondary School Principles, Reston, VA (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klahr, D.A.: Computer Simulation of the Paradox of Voting. The American Political Science Review LX (2), 384–390 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martinez, M.: Building Interactive Web Learning Environments to Match and Support Individual Learning Differences. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 11(2) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pecheanu, E., Segal, C., Stefanescu, D.: Content Modelling in Intelligent Instructional Environment. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3190, pp. 1229–1234. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schworm, S., Renkl, A.: Learning by Solved Example Problems: Instructional Explanations Reduce Self-explanation Activity. In: Gray, W.D., Schunn, C.D. (eds.) Proceeding of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 816–821. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stewart, K.L., Felicetti, L.A.: Learning Styles of Marketing Majors. Educational Research Quarterly 15(2), 15–23 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yeum, Y., Lee, W.: Usability Issues of Web-Based Assessment System for K-12 and Implementation of PAS System. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education 9(4) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Van Deemen, A.: The Probability of the Paradox of Voting for Weak Preference Orderings. Social Choice and Welfare 16(2) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. http://design.test.olt.ubc.ca/Intelligent_Tutoring_System

  21. http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/zaiane/courses/cmput605/2008-3.html

  22. http://www.engsc.ac.uk/journal/index.php/ee/article/view/62/97

  23. http://www.trainingplace.com/source/research/learningorientations.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Encheva, S. (2011). Complete Graphs and Orderings. In: Snasel, V., Platos, J., El-Qawasmeh, E. (eds) Digital Information Processing and Communications. ICDIPC 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 188. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22389-1_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22389-1_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22388-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22389-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics