Skip to main content

Topicality in Logic-Based Ontologies

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6828))

Abstract

In this paper we examine several forms of modularity in logics as a basis for various conceptions of the topical structure of an ontology. Intuitively, a topic is a coherent fragment of the subject matter of the ontology. Different topics may play different roles: e.g., the main topic (or topics), side topics, or subtopics. If, at the lowest level, the subject matter of an ontology is characterized by the set of concepts of the ontology, a topic is a “coherent” subset of those concepts. Different forms of modularity induce different, more or less cognitively helpful, notions of coherence and thus distinct topical structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: Modular reuse of ontologies: Theory and practice. J. of Artif. Intell. Research 31, 273–318 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Sattler, U.: OWL 2: The next step for owl. J. of Web Sem. 6(4), 309–322 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cuenca Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Kazakov, Y., Sattler, U.: Extracting modules from ontologies: A logic-based approach. In: Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S. (eds.) Modular Ontologies. LNCS, vol. 5445, pp. 159–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cuenca Grau, B., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Kalyanpur, A.: Modularity and web ontologies. In: Proc. of KR-2006, pp. 198–209. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Del Vescovo, C., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., Schneider, T.: The modular structure of an ontology: an empirical study. In: Proc. of DL 2010. CEUR-WS.org, vol. 573 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Del Vescovo, C., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., Schneider, T.: The modular structure of an ontology: Atomic decomposition. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2011 (accepted 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Del Vescovo, C., Parsia, B., Sattler, U., Schneider, T.: The modular structure of an ontology: atomic decomposition. Tech. rep., The University of Manchester (2011), http://bit.ly/i4olY0

  9. Garson, J.: Modularity and relevant logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30(2), 207–223 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghilardi, S., Lutz, C., Wolter, F.: Did I damage my ontology? A case for conservative extensions in description logics. In: Doherty, P., Mylopoulos, J., Welty, C.A. (eds.) Proc. of KR 2006, pp. 187–197. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jimeno, A., Jiménez-Ruiz, E., Berlanga, R., Rebholz-Schuhmann, D.: Use of shared lexical resources for efficient ontological engineering. In: SWAT4LS 2008. ceir-ws.org, vol. 435 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Konev, B., Lutz, C., Ponomaryov, D., Wolter, F.: Decomposing description logic ontologies. In: Proc. of KR 2010, pp. 236–246 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kutz, O., Lutz, C., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M.: \(\mathcal{E}\)-connections of abstract description systems. Artificial Intelligence 156(1), 1–73 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Parikh, R.: Beliefs, belief revision, and splitting languages. In: Moss, L.S., de Rijke, J.G.,, M. (eds.) Logic, language and computation, vol. 2, pp. 266–278. Center for the Study of Language and Information, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stuckenschmidt, H., Klein, M.: Structure-based partitioning of large concept hierarchies. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 289–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Del Vescovo, C., Parsia, B., Sattler, U. (2011). Topicality in Logic-Based Ontologies. In: Andrews, S., Polovina, S., Hill, R., Akhgar, B. (eds) Conceptual Structures for Discovering Knowledge. ICCS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6828. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22688-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22688-5_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22687-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22688-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics