Skip to main content

Ordinal Preference Models Based on S-Integrals and Their Verification

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 100))

Abstract

This paper discusses the ordinal preference models based on S-integrals. In parallel with the cardinal preference models based on Choquet integrals, there are various S-integrals: S-integral, SS-integral, CPTS-integral and BCS-integral.

First, we verify the ordinal models. To this aim, two psychological experiments have been conducted, where all the preferences of subjects could be modeled by S-, SS-, CPTS- and BCS-integrals. A counter example to BCSintegral models is also shown.

Next, we consider Savage’s Omelet problem in multi-criteria decision making. There are many admissible preference orders of acts depending on the consequents of acts. We find that there exist some preferences which cannot be modeled even by the BCS-integral.

Finally, to breakthrough the difficulty of BCS-integral models, we propose hierarchical preference models by which we can model the above counter examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allais, M.: Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école américaine. Econometrica 21, 503–546 (1953)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernoulli, D.: Presentation at St Petersburg Academy (1738)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards, W.: Probability-preferences in gambling. American Journal of Psychology 66, 349–364 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ellsberg, D.: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–669 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grabish, M., Labreuche, C.: Bi-capacities for decision making on bipolar scales. In: Proc. of EUROFUSE Workshop on Information Systems, Varenna, pp. 185–190 (September 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grabisch, M., Labreuche, C.: A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. 4OR - Quarterly Journal of Operations Research 6, 1–44 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Greco, S., Motarazzo, B., Slowinski, R.: Bipolar Sugeno and Choquet integrals. In: EUROFUSE Workshop on Information Systems, Varenna, pp. 191–196 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Höhle, U.: Integration with respect to fuzzy measures. In: Proc. of IFAC Symposium on Theory and Applications of Digital Control, New Delhi, pp. 35–37 (January 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Labreuche, C., Grabisch, M.: The representation of conditional relative importance between criteria. Annals of Operations Research 154, 93–112 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Murofushi, T., Sugeno, M.: An interpretation of fuzzy measures and the Choquet integral as an integral with respect to fuzzy measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 42, 201–227 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Narukawa, Y., Torra, V.: Meta-knowledge Choquet integral and bi-capacity models: links and relations. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 20, 1017–1036 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economical Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Savage, L.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, NY (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Schmeidler, D.: Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57, 517–587 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugeno, M.: Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications, Dr. Eng. Thesis. Tokyo Institute of Technology (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sugeno, M. (2011). Ordinal Preference Models Based on S-Integrals and Their Verification. In: Li, S., Wang, X., Okazaki, Y., Kawabe, J., Murofushi, T., Guan, L. (eds) Nonlinear Mathematics for Uncertainty and its Applications. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 100. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22833-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22833-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22832-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22833-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics