Skip to main content

Philosophically Inspired Concept Acquisition for Artificial General Intelligence

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6830))

Abstract

We describe a Bayesian network implementation of a theory of concepts that is motivated by observations from the philosophical debate between Lexical Concept Empiricism and Lexical Concept Nativism. According to our theory, Baptizing Meanings for Concepts (BMC), concepts are acquired by hypothesizing latent kinds/categories to explain observed co-occurrences of sets of properties in a group of objects. The hypothesized kind/category is given a name and inferential relationships are stored between the name and representations for the observable properties. We argue that this process appeases tensions in the philosophical debate by allowing for the acquisition of concepts via perception and inference, while yielding the concepts simple, in the sense of being contingently associated with other representations. The BMC is inspired by a well-known process in the philosophy of language for assigning meanings to linguistic terms [1, 2, 3, 4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kripke, S.A.: Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Putnam, H.: The meaning of meaning. Philosophical Papers: Mind, Language and Reality 2, 215–271 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Burge, T.: Individualism and the Mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, 73–121 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Soames, S.: Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. OUP (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harnad, S.: The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D 42, 335–346 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, E.C., Lewicki, M.S.: Efficient auditory coding. Nature 439(7079), 978–982 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hinton, G.E., Salakhutdinov, R.R.: Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786), 504 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Teh, Y.W., And Jordan, M.I.: Hierarchical Bayesian Nonparametric Models with Applications. In: Bayesian Nonparametrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fodor, J.A.: Fodor’s Guide to Mental Representation. Mind 94, 76–100 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fodor, J.A.: Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. OUP, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fodor, J.A.: Pyschosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fodor, J.A., Garrett, M.F., Walker, E., Parkes, C.T.: Against Definitions. Cognition 8, 263–367

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B.: Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7, 573–605 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosch, E.: Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4, 328–350 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy, G.L.: The Big Book of Concepts. MIT Press, A Bradford Book (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Barsalou, L.: Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 577–660 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prinz, J.: Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and their Perceptual Basis. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, E.E., Medin, D.L.: Categories and Concepts. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carey, S.: Conceptual Change in Childhood. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A.N.: Words, Thoughts, and Theories. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Keil, F.C.: Concepts, Kinds and Cognitive Development. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spelke, E.: Initial knowledge: six suggestions. Cognition 50, 431–445 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Frege, G.: Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik100, 25–50 (1892); Translated as Black, M.: On Sense and Reference. In: Translations from the Philosophical Writings of G. Frege, P. Geach, M. Black (eds. and trans.), 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning. McGraw Hill, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Tenenbaum, J.B., Griffiths, T.L.: Theory-Based Causal Inference. In: Becker, S., Thrun, S., Obermayer, K. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 15. MIT, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sobel, D.M., Tenenbaum, J.B., Gopnik, A.: Children’s causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cognitive Science 28(3), 303–333 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tenenbaum, J.B., Griffiths, T.L., Kemp, C.: Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition 10(7), 309–318 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vallabha, G., McClelland, J., Pons, F., Werker, J., Amano, S.: Unsupervised learning of vowel categories from infant-directed speech. Proc. of the National Academy of Science 104 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fasel, I., Wilt, A., Morrison, C., Oved, I.: University of Arizona Tech Report: Unsupervised Concept Discovery through Intrinsically Motivated Exploration

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oved, I., Fasel, I. (2011). Philosophically Inspired Concept Acquisition for Artificial General Intelligence. In: Schmidhuber, J., Thórisson, K.R., Looks, M. (eds) Artificial General Intelligence. AGI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6830. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22887-2_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22887-2_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22886-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22887-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics