Skip to main content

Approximating the Influence of Monotone Boolean Functions in \(O(\sqrt{n})\) Query Complexity

  • Conference paper
Book cover Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX 2011, RANDOM 2011)

Abstract

The Total Influence (Average Sensitivity) of a discrete function is one of its fundamental measures. We study the problem of approximating the total influence of a monotone Boolean function \(f: \{0,1\}^n \longrightarrow \{0,1\}\), which we denote by I[f]. We present a randomized algorithm that approximates the influence of such functions to within a multiplicative factor of (1,±ε) by performing \(O\left(\frac{\sqrt{n}\log n}{I[f]}{\rm poly}(1/\epsilon) \right) \) queries. We also prove a lower bound of \(\Omega\left(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n \cdot I[f]}\right)\) on the query complexity of any constant-factor approximation algorithm for this problem (which holds for I[f] = Ω(1)), hence showing that our algorithm is almost optimal in terms of its dependence on n. For general functions we give a lower bound of \(\Omega\left(\frac{n}{I[f]}\right)\), which matches the complexity of a simple sampling algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow, K.: A difficulty in the theory of social welfare. Journal of Political Economics 58, 328–346 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Or, M., Linial, N.: Collective coin flipping, robust voting schemes and minima of Banzhaf values. In: Proceedings of FOCS, pp. 408–416 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamini, I., Kalai, G., Schramm, O.: Noise sensitivity of boolean functions and applications to percolation. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 90, 5–43 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Blais, E.: Improved bounds for testing juntas. In: Goel, A., Jansen, K., Rolim, J.D.P., Rubinfeld, R. (eds.) APPROX and RANDOM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5171, pp. 317–330. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Blais, E.: Testing juntas nearly optimally. In: Proceedings of STOC, pp. 151–158 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bshouty, N., Tamon, C.: On the Fourier spectrum of monotone functions. Journal of the ACM 43(4), 747–770 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chernoff, H.: A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Annals of the Mathematical Statistics 23, 493–507 (1952)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Diakonikolas, I., Harsha, P., Klivans, A., Meka, R., Raghavendra, P., Servedio, R., Tan, L.-Y.: Bounding the average sensitivity and noise sensitivity of polynomial threshold functions. In: Proceedings of STOC, pp. 533–543 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dinur, I., Safra, S.: The importance of being biased. In: Proceedings of STOC, pp. 33–42 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer, E., Kindler, G., Ron, D., Safra, S., Samorodnitsky, S.: Testing juntas. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 68(4), 753–787 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedgut, E., Kalai, G.: Every monotone graph property has a sharp threshold. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 124, 2993–3002 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kalai, G., Safra, S.: Threshold phenomena and influence. In: Computational Complexity and Statistical Physics, pp. 25–60 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hancock, T., Mansour, Y.: Learning monotone k-μ DNF formulas on product distributions. In: Proceedings of COLT, pp. 179–183 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jerrum, M.: Counting, Sampling and Integrating: algorithms and complexity. Lectures in Mathematics. ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser, Basel (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalai, G.: A Fourier-theoretic perspective for the Condorcet Paradox and Arrow’s Theorem. Advances in Applied Mathematics 29, 412–426 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalai, G.: Social indeterminacy. Econometrica 72, 1565–1581 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalai, G., Kahn, J., Linial, N.: The influence of variables on Boolean functions. In: Proceedings of FOCS, pp. 68–80 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khot, S.: On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. In: Proceedings of STOC, pp. 767–775 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krivelevich, M., Sudakov, B., Vu, V.H.: A sharp threshold for network reliability. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 11, 465–474 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lehrer, E.: An axiomatization of the Banzhaf value. International Journal of Game Theory 17, 89–99 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Linial, N., Mansour, Y., Nisan, N.: Constant depth circuits, Fourier transform, and learnability. Journal of the ACM 40(3), 607–620 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Matulef, K., O’Donnell, R., Rubinfeld, R., Servedio, R.A.: Testing { − 1, + 1} halfspaces. In: Dinur, I., Jansen, K., Naor, J., Rolim, J. (eds.) APPROX 2009. LNCS, vol. 5687, pp. 646–657. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Matulef, K., Servedio, R., Wimmer, K.: Personal communication (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. O’Donnell, R., Servedio, R.: Learning monotone decision trees in polynomial time. SIAM Journal on Computing 37(3), 827–844 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ron, D., Rubinfeld, R., Safra, M., Weinstein, O.: Approximating the influence of a monotone boolean function in \(o(\sqrt{n})\) query complexity. Technical report, arXiv:1101.5345 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ron, D., Tsur, G.: Testing computability by width two oBDDs. In: Dinur, I., Jansen, K., Naor, J., Rolim, J. (eds.) APPROX 2009. LNCS, vol. 5687, pp. 686–699. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Russo, L.: On the critical percolation probabilities. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Geb. 56, 229–237 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Talagrand, M.: On Russo’s approximate 0 − 1 law. Annals of Probability 22, 1576–1587 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ron, D., Rubinfeld, R., Safra, M., Weinstein, O. (2011). Approximating the Influence of Monotone Boolean Functions in \(O(\sqrt{n})\) Query Complexity. In: Goldberg, L.A., Jansen, K., Ravi, R., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds) Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques. APPROX RANDOM 2011 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6845. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22935-0_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22935-0_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22934-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22935-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics