Skip to main content

Query Complexity in Errorless Hardness Amplification

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6845))

Abstract

An errorless circuit for a boolean function is one that outputs the correct answer or “don’t know” on each input (and never outputs the wrong answer). The goal of errorless hardness amplification is to show that if f has no size s errorless circuit that outputs “don’t know” on at most a δ fraction of inputs, then some f′ related to f has no size s′ errorless circuit that outputs “don’t know” on at most a 1 − ε fraction of inputs. Thus the hardness is “amplified” from δ to 1 − ε. Unfortunately, this amplification comes at the cost of a loss in circuit size. This is because such results are proven by reductions which show that any size s′ errorless circuit for f′ that outputs “don’t know” on at most a 1 − ε fraction of inputs could be used to construct a size s errorless circuit for f that outputs “don’t know” on at most a δ fraction of inputs. If the reduction makes q queries to the hypothesized errorless circuit for f′, then plugging in a size s′ circuit yields a circuit of size ≥ qs′, and thus we must have s′ ≤ s/q. Hence it is desirable to keep the query complexity to a minimum. The first results on errorless hardness amplification were obtained by Bogdanov and Safra (FOCS 2007). They achieved query complexity \(O\big((\frac{1}{\delta}\log\frac{1}{\epsilon})^2\cdot\frac{1}{\epsilon}\log\frac{1}{\delta}\big)\) when f′ is the XOR of several independent copies of f. We improve the query complexity (and hence the loss in circuit size) to \(O\big(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\log\frac{1}{\delta}\big)\), which is optimal up to constant factors for nonadaptive black-box errorless hardness amplification. Bogdanov and Safra also proved a result that allows for errorless hardness amplification within NP. They achieved query complexity \(O\big(k^3\cdot\frac{1}{\epsilon^2}\log\frac{1}{\delta}\big)\) when f′ consists of any monotone function applied to the outputs of k independent copies of f, provided the monotone function satisfies a certain combinatorial property parameterized by δ and ε. We improve the query complexity to \(O\big(\frac{k}{t}\cdot\frac{1}{\epsilon}\log\frac{1}{\delta}\big)\), where t ≥ 1 is a certain parameter of the monotone function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Artemenko, S., Shaltiel, R.: Lower Bounds on the Query Complexity of Non-Uniform and Adaptive Reductions Showing Hardness Amplification. In: To appear in Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Randomization and Computation (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bogdanov, A., Safra, M.: Hardness Amplification for Errorless Heuristics. In: Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 418–426 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldreich, O., Nisan, N., Wigderson, A.: On Yao’s XOR Lemma. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, Technical Report TR95-050 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Healy, A., Vadhan, S., Viola, E.: Using Nondeterminism to Amplify Hardness. SIAM Journal on Computing 35(4), 903–931 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Impagliazzo, R.: Hard-Core Distributions for Somewhat Hard Problems. In: Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 538–545 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klivans, A., Servedio, R.: Boosting and Hard-Core Sets. Machine Learning 53(3), 217–238 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Levin, L.: Average Case Complete Problems. SIAM Journal on Computing 15(1), 285–286 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Levin, L.: One-Way Functions and Pseudorandom Generators. Combinatorica 7(4), 357–363 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Donnell, R.: Hardness Amplification Within NP. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 69(1), 68–94 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaltiel, R., Viola, E.: Hardness Amplification Proofs Require Majority. SIAM Journal on Computing 39(7), 3122–3154 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Watson, T. (2011). Query Complexity in Errorless Hardness Amplification. In: Goldberg, L.A., Jansen, K., Ravi, R., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds) Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques. APPROX RANDOM 2011 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6845. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22935-0_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22935-0_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22934-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22935-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics