Skip to main content

Evidential Risk Analysis Based on the Fuzzy Belief TOPSIS

  • Conference paper
  • 1598 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 227))

Abstract

Risk analysis and assessment is essentially a synthesis and amalgamation of the empirical and normative, the quantitative and qualitative, and the objective and subjective effort. In order to deal with quantitative and qualitative data, empirical and subjective knowledge, and incomplete, ignorant, fuzzy, vague information in risk analysis and assessment, a novel risk analysis method is proposed in this paper, which refers to evidential risk analysis. The proposed method represents risk by the fuzzy belief structure, aggregates the multiple decision maker opinions using the evidential reasoning approach, and makes risk decision support using belief TOPSIS. The evidential risk analysis process and algorithm is illuminated step by step. Finally, a case study of bridge risk assessment is explored to show validity and applicability of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DoD, Risk management guide for DoD acquisition, Washington, DC: Department of Defense (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haimes, Y.Y.: Risk modeling, assessment, and management, 3rd edn. Wiley, John Wiley & Sons Inc, Chichester (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan, S., Garrick, B.J.: On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1(1), 11–27 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. NASA, Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners, Washington, DC: Office of Safety and Mission Assurance NASA Headquarters (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Apostolakis, G.: The concept of probability in safety assessment of technological systems. Science 250, 1359–1364 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wei, S.H., Chen, S.M.: A new approach for fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems With Application 36(1), 589–598 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. J. Chen and S.M. Chen, “Fuzzy risk analysis based on measures of similarity between interval-valued fuzzy numbers. Computers & Mathematics With Application, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1670-1685, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L.: On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 32, 289–304 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, J.B., Wang, Y.M., Xu, D.L., Chin, K.S.: The evidential reasoning approach for MCDA under both probabilistic and fuzzy uncertainties. European Journal of Operational Research 171(1), 309–343 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, Y.M., Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L.: Environmental Impact Assessment Using the Evidential Reasoning Approach. European Journal of Operational Research 174(3), 1885–1913 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chin, K.S., Wang, Y.M., Poon, G.K.K., Yang, J.B.: Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach. Computers and Operations Research 36(6), 1768–1779 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, J., Chen, Y.W., Tang, D.W., Chen, Y.W.: TOPSIS with Belief Structure for Group Belief Multiple Criteria Decision Making. International Journal of Automation and Computing 7(3), 359–364 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Y.M., Elhag, T.M.S.: Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems With Applications 31(2), 309–319 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jiang, J., Li, X., Chen, Y., Fang, D. (2011). Evidential Risk Analysis Based on the Fuzzy Belief TOPSIS. In: Zhang, J. (eds) Applied Informatics and Communication. ICAIC 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 227. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23226-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23226-8_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23225-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23226-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics