Skip to main content

Generating Decision Makers’ Preferences, from their Goals, Constraints, Priorities and Emotions

  • Conference paper
Brain Informatics (BI 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6889))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 864 Accesses

Abstract

The Constrained Rationality framework, a formal qualitative goals and constraints reasoning framework for single and multi agents to analyze and rationalize about strategic decisions/conflicts, is extended in this paper by adding: 1) modeling mechanisms to include the agent’s priorities, emotions and attitudes within the context of the conflict; and 2) eliciting the agent’s cardinal and ordinal preferences over his alternatives using the amount of achievement the strategic goals of the agent can harness from each alternative, given the collective goals, constraints, priorities, emotions and attitudes, the agent has. An illustrative example and some experimental results are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework and the proposed modeling and reasoning mechanisms in the context of a strategic decision making case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Keeney, R.: Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decisionmaking. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., Metcalfe, D.: Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning About Rational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Winikoff, M., Harland, J., Padgham, L.: Linking Agent Concepts and Methodology with CAN. In: Submitted to the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shaw, P.H., Bordini, R.H.: Towards Alternative Approaches to Reasoning About Goals. In: Baldoni, M., Son, T.C., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Winikoff, M. (eds.) DALT 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4897, pp. 104–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dardenne, A., van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed Requirements Acquisition. Science of Computer Programming 20, 3–50 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Shawa, M.: Viewpoints-based Value-Driven - Enterprise Knowledge Management (ViVD-EKM). MASc thesis, Electrical and Computer Engineering. University of Waterloo (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Shawa, M.: Constrained Rationality: Formal Value-Driven Enterprise Knowledge Management Modelling and Analysis Framework for Strategic Business, Technology and Public Policy Decision Making & Conflict Resolutio. Ph.D. dissertation, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Shawa, M., Basir, O.: Constrained Rationality: Formal Goals-Reasoning Approach to Strategic Decision & Conflict Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGrawHill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Thagard, P.: Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thagard, P., Millgram, E.: Inference to the best plan: A coherence theory of decision. In: Ram, A., Leake, D. (eds.) Goal-Driven Learning, pp. 439–454 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Al-Shawa, M. (2011). Generating Decision Makers’ Preferences, from their Goals, Constraints, Priorities and Emotions. In: Hu, B., Liu, J., Chen, L., Zhong, N. (eds) Brain Informatics. BI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6889. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23605-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23605-1_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23604-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23605-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics