Skip to main content

Procedural Knowledge Extraction on MEDLINE Abstracts

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6890))

Abstract

Text mining is a popular methodology for building Technology Intelligence which helps companies or organizations to make better decisions by providing knowledge about the state-of-the-art technologies obtained from the Internet or inside companies. As a matter of fact, the objects or events (so-called declarative knowledge) are the target knowledge that text miners want to catch in general. However, we propose how to extract procedural knowledge rather than declarative knowledge utilizing machine learning method with deep language processing features, as well as how to model it. We show the representation of procedural knowledge in MEDLINE abstracts and provide experiments that are quite promising in that it shows 82% and 63% performances of purpose/solutions (two components of procedural knowledge model) extraction and unit process (basic unit of purpose/solutions) identification respectively, even though we applied strict guidelines in evaluating the performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mortara, L., Kerr, I.V.C., Phaal, R., Probert, D.: Technology Intelligence Practice in UK Technology-based Companies. International Journal of Tehcnology Management 48, 115–135 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yoon, B.: On the development of a technology intelligence tool for identifying technology opportunity. Expert Systems with Applications 35, 124–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Turban, E., Aronson, E.: Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sahdra, B., Thagard, P.: ‘Procedural knowledge in molecular biology. Philosophical Psychology 16, 477–498 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kazuhiro, Y., Junichi, T.: Reranking for Biomedical Named-Entity Recognition. Biomedical Natural Language Processing, BioNLP (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshimasa, T., Junichi, T., Sophia, A.: FACTA: a text search engine for finding associated biomedical concepts. Bioinformatics 24, 2559–2560 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sophia, A., Carol, F., Junichi, T.: ‘Introduction: named entity recognition in biomedicine. Biomedical Informatics 37, 393–395 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong-Woo, C., Yoshimasa, T., Jin-Dong, K., Rie, S., Naoki, N., Teruyoshi, H., Junichi, T.: Automatic recognition of topic-classified relations between prostate cancer and genes using MEDLINE abstracts. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Toshihide, O., Haretsugu, H., Akira, T., Toshihisa, T.: “Automated extraction of information on protein-protein interactions from the biological literature. Bioinformatics 12, 155–161 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jung, Y., Ryu, J., Kim, K.-m., Myaeng, S.-H.: Automatic construction of a large-scale situation ontology by mining how-to instructions from the web. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 8, 110–124 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirohata, K., Okazaki, N., Ananiadou, S., Ishizuka, M., Biocentre, M.I.: “Identifying sections in scientific abstracts using conditional random fields. In: Proc. of 3rd International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 381–388 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ruch, P., Boyer, C., Chichester, C., Tbahriti, I., Geissbühler, A., Fabry, P., Gobeill, J., Pillet, V., Rebholz-Schuhmann, D., Lovis, C., Veuthey, A.-L.: “Using argumentation to extract key sentences from biomedical abstracts. International journal of medical informatics 76, 195–200 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yakushiji, A., Miyao, Y., Ohta, T., Tateisi, Y., Tsujii, J.: “Automatic construction of predicate-argument structure patterns for biomedical information extraction. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - EMNLP 2006, p. 284 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Porter, M.F.: An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14, 130–137 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Song, Sk. et al. (2011). Procedural Knowledge Extraction on MEDLINE Abstracts. In: Zhong, N., Callaghan, V., Ghorbani, A.A., Hu, B. (eds) Active Media Technology. AMT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6890. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23620-4_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23620-4_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23619-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23620-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics