Skip to main content

On Mini-Buckets and the Min-fill Elimination Ordering

  • Conference paper
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming – CP 2011 (CP 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6876))

  • 1733 Accesses

Abstract

Mini-Bucket Elimination (MBE) is a well-known approximation of Bucket Elimination (BE), deriving bounds on quantities of interest over graphical models. Both algorithms are based on the sequential transformation of the original problem by eliminating variables, one at a time. The order in which variables are eliminated is usually computed using the greedy min-fill heuristic. In the BE case, this heuristic has a clear intuition, because it faithfully represents the structure of the sequence of sub-problems that BE generates and orders the variables using a greedy criteria based on such structure. However, MBE produces a sequence of sub-problems with a different structure. Therefore, using the min-fill heuristic with MBE means that decisions are made using the structure of the sub-problems that BE would produce, which is clearly meaningless. In this paper we propose a modification of the min-fill ordering heuristic that takes into account this fact. Our experiments on a number of benchmarks over two important tasks (i.e., computing the probability of evidence and optimization) show that MBE using the new ordering is often far more accurate than using the standard one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bertelè, U., Brioschi, F.: Nonserial Dynamic Programming. Academic Press, London (1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dechter, R.: Bucket elimination: A unifying framework for reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 113, 41–85 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dechter, R.: Constraint Processing. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dechter, R., Kask, K., Mateescu, R.: Iterative join-graph propagation. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference in UAI, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 128–136 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dechter, R., Rish, I.: Mini-buckets: A general scheme for bounded inference. Journal of the ACM 50(2), 107–153 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Freuder, E.: A sufficient condition for backtrack-free search. Journal of the ACM 29, 24–32 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kask, K., Dechter, R.: A general scheme for automatic generation of search heuristics from specification dependencies. Artificial Intelligence 129, 91–131 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearson, M., Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y.: Towards a universal test suite for combinatorial auction algorithms. In: ACM E-Commerce, pp. 66–76 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Larkin, D.: Approximate decomposition: A method for bounding and estimating probabilistic and deterministic queries. In: Proceedings UAI, Acapulco, Mexico, pp. 346–353 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Larkin, D.: Semi-independent partitioning: A method for bounding the solution to cop’s. In: Rossi, F. (ed.) CP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2833, pp. 894–898. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Park, J.D.: Using weighted max-sat engines to solve mpe. In: Proc. of the 18th AAAI, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pp. 682–687 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rollon, E., Dechter, R.: New mini-bucket partitioning heuristics for bounding the probability of evidence. In: Proc. of the 24th AAAI, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shenoy, P.: Axioms for dynamic programming. In: Computational Learning and Probabilistic Reasoning, pp. 259–275 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wemmenhove, B., Mooij, J.M., Wiegerinck, W., Leisink, M.A.R., Kappen, H.J., Neijt, J.P.: Inference in the promedas medical expert system. In: 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 456–460 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rollon, E., Larrosa, J. (2011). On Mini-Buckets and the Min-fill Elimination Ordering. In: Lee, J. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming – CP 2011. CP 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6876. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23786-7_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23786-7_57

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23785-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23786-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics