Skip to main content

A Change Model for Credibility Partial Order

  • Conference paper
Book cover Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6929))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In a multi-agent system (MAS), an agent may often receive information through a potentially large number of informants. We will consider the case where the informants are independent agents who have their own interests and, therefore, are not necessarily completely reliable; in this setup, it will be natural for some agent to believe an informant more than other. The use of the notion of credibility will allow agents to organize their peers in a partial order that will reflect the relative credibility of their informants. It is also natural that the assigned credibility will change dynamically, leading to changes in the associated partial order. We will investigate the problem of updating the credibility order to reflect the change in the perceived agent’s credibility, seeking to define a complete change theory over the agents’ trust and reputation. The focus will be on the characterization and development of change operators (expansion, contraction, and revision) for modeling the dynamics of this partial order of agents. These operators, characterized through postulates and representation theorems, can be used to dynamically modify the credibility of informants to reflect a new perception of informant’s plausibility, or admit the arrival of a new agent to the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber, K.S., Kim, J.: Belief revision process based on trust: Simulation experiments. In: Proceedings of Autonomous Agents 2001 Workshop on Deception, Fraud, and Trust in Agent Societies, pp. 1–12 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Williams, M.A.: A practical approach to revising prioritized knowledge bases. Studia Logica 70(1), 105–130 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Boutilier, C.: Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25(3), 262–305 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 14(1), 75–90 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cantwell, J.: Resolving conflicting information. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7(2), 191–220 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Darwiche, A., Pearl, J.: On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artificial Intelligence 89, 1–29 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Delgrande, J.P., Dubois, D., Lang, J.: Iterated revision as prioritized merging. In: 10th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, UK, pp. 210–220 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dellarocas, C.: The digitalization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online reputation mexhanisms. In: Management Science (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dragoni, A., Giorgini, P., Puliti, P.: Distributed belief revision versus distributed truth maintenance. In: Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (TAI 1994), pp. 499–505. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman, N., Halpern, J.: Belief Revision: A Critique. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8(4), 401–420 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hansson, S.O.: Kernel contraction. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59(3), 845–859 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kfir-Dahav, N.E., Tennenholz, M.: Multi-agent belief revision. In: Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge: Proceeding of the Sixth Conference (TARK 1996), pp. 175–196. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, W., Williams, M.: A framework for multi-agent belief revision, part i: The role of ontology. In: Foo, N.Y. (ed.) AI 1999. LNCS, vol. 1747, pp. 168–179. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artificial Intelligence Review 24(1), 33–60 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Regret: A reputation model for gregarious societies. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, pp. 61–69 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Simari, P.D., Falappa, M.A.: Revision of informant plausibility in multi-agent systems. Journal of Computer Science and Technology 2(5) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tamargo, L.H., García, A.J., Falappa, M.A., Simari, G.R.: Modeling knowledge dynamics in multi-agent systems based on informants. In: The Knowledge Engineering Review, KER (2010) (in print)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tamargo, L.H., Falappa, M.A., García, A.J., Simari, G.R. (2011). A Change Model for Credibility Partial Order. In: Benferhat, S., Grant, J. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6929. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23962-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23963-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics