Skip to main content

It’s in Their Eyes: A Study on Female and Male Virtual Humans’ Gaze

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6895))

Abstract

Social psychological research demonstrates that the same behavior might lead to different evaluations depending on whether it is shown by a man or a woman. With a view to design decisions with regard to virtual humans it is relevant to test whether this pattern also applies to gendered virtual humans. In a 2x2 between subjects experiment we manipulated the Rapport Agent’s gaze behavior and its gender in order to test whether especially female agents are evaluated more negatively when they do not show gender specific immediacy behavior and avoid gazing at the interaction partner. Instead of this interaction effect we found two main effects: gaze avoidance was evaluated negatively and female agents were rated more positively than male agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ruttkay, Z., Pelachaud, C. (eds.): From brows to trust: evaluating embodied conversational agents. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Krämer, N.C.: Soziale Wirkungen virtueller Helfer. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krämer, N.C., Hoffmann, L., Kopp, S.: Know Your Users! Empirical Results for Tailoring an Agent´s Nonverbal Behavior to Different User Groups. In: Safonova, A. (ed.) IVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6356, pp. 468–474. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cowell, A.J., Stanney, K.M.: Embodiment and Interaction Guidelines for Designing Credible, Trustworthy Embodied Conversational Agents. In: Rist, T., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Rickel, J. (eds.) IVA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2792, pp. 301–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Deutsch, F.M., LeBaron, D., Fryer, M.M.: What is in a smile? Psychology of Women Quarterly 11, 341–352 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Argyle, M., Dean, J.: Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry 28, 289–304 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burgoon, J.K., Coker, D.A., Coker, R.A.: Communicative effects of gaze behavior. Human Communication Research 12, 495–524 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gratch, J., Okhmatovskaia, A., Lamothe, F., Marsella, S.C., Morales, M., van der Werf, R.J., Morency, L.-P.: Virtual rapport. In: Gratch, J., Young, M., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P. (eds.) IVA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4133, pp. 14–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Gratch, J., Wang, N., Gerten, J., Fast, E., Duffy, R.: Creating rapport with virtual agents. In: Pelachaud, C., Martin, J.-C., André, E., Chollet, G., Karpouzis, K., Pelé, D. (eds.) IVA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4722, pp. 125–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Tickle-Degnen, L., Rosenthal, R.: The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry 1, 285–293 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. In: Kendon, A. (ed.) Nonverbal Communication, Interaction, and Gesture, pp. 57–106. Mouton, The Hague (1981)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsumoto, D., Keltner, D., Shiota, M.N., O’Sullivan, M., Frank, M.: Facial Expressions of Emotion. In: Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J.M., Barrett, L.F. (eds.) Handbook of Emotions, 3rd edn., pp. 211–234. The Guilford Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richmond, V.P., McCroskey, J.C., Payne, S.K.: Nonverbal Behaviour in Interpersonal Relations, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anstis, S.M., Mayhew, J.W., Morley, T.: The perception of where a face or television ‘portrait’ is looking. The American Journal of Psychology 82, 474–489 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gibson, J.J., Pick, A.D.: Perception of another person’s looking behavior. The American Journal of Psychology 78, 386–394 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Duncan Jr., S.: Nonverbal communication. Psychological Bulletin 72, 118–137 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burgoon, J.K., Bacue, A.E.: Nonverbal communication skills. In: Greene, J.O., Burleson, B.R. (eds.) Handbook of Communication and Social Interaction Skills, pp. 179–220. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Exline, R., Gray, D., Schuette, D.: Visual behavior in a dyad as affected by interview content and sex of respondent. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1, 201–209 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ickes, W., Barnes, R.D.: The role of sex and self-monitoring in unstructured dyadic interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 315–330 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Briton, N.J., Hall, J.A.: Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles 32, 79–90 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fiske, S.T., Stevens, L.E.: What’s so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In: Oskamp, S., Costanzo, M. (eds.) Gender Issues in Contemporary Society, pp. 173–196. Sage, Newbury Park (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Devine, P.G.: Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56, 5–18 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nass, C., Moon, Y., Green, N.: Are machines gender neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27, 864–876 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moon, Y.: Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. The Journal of Consumer Research 26, 323–339 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kang, S., Gratch, J.: People like virtual counselors hat highly-disclose about themselves. The Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine (in press, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Watson, D., Tellegen, A., Clark, L.A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 1063–1070 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Von der Pütten, A., Krämer, N.C., Gratch, J., Kang, S.-H.: “It doesn’t matter what you are¡‘ Explaining social effects of agents and avatars. Computer in Human Behavior 26, 1641–1650 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bem, S.L.: The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42, 155–162 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bailenson, J.N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C., Loomis, J.M.: Equilibrium theory revisited: Mutual gaze and personal space in virtual environments. Presence 10, 583–598 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Biocca, F., Harms, C., Gregg, J.: The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. Paper presented at the 4th Annual International Workshop on Presence, Philadelphia (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cheek, J.M.: The Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale. Wellesley College, Wellesley (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Davis, M.: A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology 10, 85 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Carney, D.R., Harrigan, J.A.: It takes one to know one: Interpersonal sensitivity is related to accurate assessments of others’ interpersonal sensitivity. Emotion 3, 194–200 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Riggio, R.E.: The Social Skills Inventory (SSI): Measuring nonverbal and social skills. In: Manusov, V. (ed.) The Sourcebook of Nonverbal Measures: Going Beyond Words, pp. 23–31. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Morency, L.-P., Sidner, C.L., Lee, C., Darrell, T.: Contextual recognition of head gestures. In: 7th International Conference on Multimodal Interactions, Toronto, Italy (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mehrabian, A.: Nonverbal communication. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bavelas, J.B., Coates, L., Johnson, T.: Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication 52, 566–580 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Duncan Jr., S.: Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23, 283–292 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hogg, R.V., Tanis, E.A.: Probability and Statistical Inference. Macmillan, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kipp, M., Gebhard, P.: IGaze: Studying Reactive Gaze Behavior in Semi-immersive Human-Avatar Interactions. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 191–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kulms, P., Krämer, N.C., Gratch, J., Kang, SH. (2011). It’s in Their Eyes: A Study on Female and Male Virtual Humans’ Gaze. In: Vilhjálmsson, H.H., Kopp, S., Marsella, S., Thórisson, K.R. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6895. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23973-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23974-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics