Abstract
Organizational theory is in a poor state today. Supporting this claim, an article in Nature in 2011 listed the top challenges, including at fifth, the inability by social scientists to aggregate individual data to group, organizational and system levels. We have proposed that this failure derives from treating interdependence as a hindrance to experimental replications rather than the primary characteristic of social behavior. Recent studies have shown that bistability can be used theoretically to explain states of interdependence common to group debates preceding a decision (e.g., interdependently speaking and listening, and reacting). The goal of this study is to investigate interdependence in groups in the laboratory when specific parameters are placed on debate outcomes. Participants are instructed to engage in debate with one another over various topics (i.e., business, abortion, and race) and placed under one of two decision rules as instructed: consensus or majority rule. The degree to which participants remain “engaged” in the debate is of particular interest in this study. Prior to the test trial each participant completes a pre-discussion questionnaire designed to ascertain personal beliefs regarding each of the topics discussed. Participants complete a similar questionnaire immediately following the test trials. In addition, galvanic skin responses (GSR) and utterance counts over time are being obtained from randomly selected participants as a measure of autonomic arousal. We plan to analyze with time series. We expect that time-series data from groups, teams and organizations can augment self-reported data collected from individuals. Preliminary findings will be reviewed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ambrose, S.H.: Paleolithic technology and human evolution. Science 291, 1748–1753 (2001)
APS, Message from the APS President (Am. Physical Society) (2010), http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200910/climate.cfm
Baumeister, R.F., Campbell, J.D., Krueger, J.I., Vohs, K.D.: Exploding the self-esteem myth. Scientific American (January 2005)
WP, White Paper. European governance (COM, 428 final; Brussels, July 25, 2001), Brussels, Commission of the European Community, p. 29 (2001), http://ec.europa.eu/governance/white_paper/en.pdf (retrieved 2002)
Benincà, E., Jöhnk, K.D., Heerkloss, R., Huisman, J.: Coupled predator-prey oscillations in a chaotic food web. Ecology Letters 12, 1367–1378 (2009)
Bloom, N., Dorgan, S., Dowdy, J., Van Reenen, J.: Management practice and productivity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(4), 1351–1408 (2007)
Bonito, J.A., Keyton, J., Sanders, R.E.: The Grand Challenge of Understanding Group Effectiveness. NSF SBE 2020 (2010), http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020/all.cfm.ID#220
Giles, J.: Social science lines up its biggest challenges. ’Top ten’ crucial questions set research priorities for the field. Nature 470, 18–19 (2011)
Jasny, B.R., Zahn, L.M., Marshall, E.: Connections: Introduction to the Special Issue on Complex systems and networks. Science 325, 405 (2009)
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., Bolger, N.: Data analysis in social psychology. In: Gilbert, D.T., Fiske, S.T., Lindzey, G. (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. I, pp. 233–268. McGraw-Hill, Boston (1998)
Lawless, W.F., Bergman, M., Louçã, J., Kriegel, N.N., Feltovich, N.: A quantum metric of organizational performance: Terrorism and counterterrorism. Computational & Mathematical Organizational Theory 13, 241–281 (2007)
Lawless, W.F., Whitton, J., Poppeliers, C.: Case studies from the UK and US of stakeholder decision-making on radioactive waste management. ASCE Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 12(2), 70–78 (2008)
Lawless, W.F., Sofge, D.A., Goranson, H.T.: Conservation of Information: A New Approach to Organizing Human-Machine-Robotic Agents under Uncertainty. In: Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.) QI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5494, pp. 184–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Lawless, W.F., Rifkin, S., Sofge, D.A., Hobbs, S.H., Angjellari-Dajci, F., Chaudron, L.: Conservation of Information: Reverse engineering dark social systems. Structure and Dynamics: eJournal of Anthropological and Related Sciences (2010a), http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/38475290;jsessionid=26B6D90CDDDF7EA3381780C60C2B8490#page-1
Lawless, W.F., Angjellari-Dajci, F., Sofge, D.: EU Economic Integration: Lessons of the Past, and What Does the Future Hold?, Dallas, TX, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (March 18, 2010b), http://www.dallasfed.org/institute/events/10eu.cfm
Lawless, W.F., Angjellari-Dajci, F., Sage, D.A., Grayson, J., Rychly, L.: A new approach to organizations: Stability and transformation in dark social networks (DSN). Journal of Enterprise Transformation (Taylor & Francis) (2011) (forthcoming)
Pfeffer, J., Fong, C.T.: Building organization theory from first principles. Organization Science 16, 372–388 (2005)
Wickens, C.D.: Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd edn. Merrill Publishing, Columbus (1992)
Wood, J.: EIRB Status (UNCLASSIFIED), personal email (January 31, 2011)
Wood, Stachura, Astapova, Fjorentina, Tung, Lawless (Corresponding Author): Review of electronic research in Georgia: Telemedicine, eHealth and e-IRBs. In: Miranda, M., Cruz-Cunha, M.M. (eds.) Handbook of Research on ICTs for Healthcare and Social Services: Developments and Applications. IGI, Hershey (2011) (in preparation, tentatively accepted)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Enslein, A. et al. (2011). Autonomic Arousal during Group Decision Making Consensus Rules versus Majority Rules: Pilot Study. In: Cruz-Cunha, M.M., Varajão, J., Powell, P., Martinho, R. (eds) ENTERprise Information Systems. CENTERIS 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 220. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24355-4_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24355-4_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24354-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24355-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)