Skip to main content

Information Systems for Sustainability: Hofstede’s Cultural Differences in the Perception of a Quality Measure for Sustainability Reports

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 219))

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to reflect on the effect of Hofstede’s cultural differences on the perception of a quality measure for sustainability reports. The study is conducted with advanced accounting students in two countries (Spain and the United States) as a proxy for users of the main information system tool for sustainability, the sustainability reports. The quality measure is based on previous research. The hypotheses are formulated linking the quality measure variables with the five Hofstede’s dimensions of culture, concluding on the consistency of the hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pohl, M.: Corporate Culture and Csr – How They Interrelate and Consequences for Successful Implementation. In: Hennigfeld, J., Pohl, M., Tolhurst, N. (eds.) The ICCA Handbook on Corporate Social Responsibility, pp. 47–59. Wiley, West Sussex (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hofstede, G.J.: A quarter century of ”Culture’s Consequences”: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. J. of International Business Studies 37(3), 285–320 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Orr, L.M., Hauser, W.J.: A Re-Inquiry of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions: A Call For 21st Century Cross-Cultural Research. Marketing Management Journal 18(2), 1–19 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taras, V., Steel, P., Kirkman, B.L.: Examining the Impact of Culture’s Consequences: A Three-Decade, Multilevel, Meta-Analytic Review of Hofstede’s Cultural Value Dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology 95(3), 405–439 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Swaidan, Z., Hayes, L.A.: Hofstede Theory and Cross Cultural Ethics: Conceptualization, Review, and Research Agenda. The Journal of American Academy of Business (2) (March 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., Ruiz, S.: Measuring quality of sustainability reports and assurance statements: characteristics of the high quality reporting companies. Int. J. Society Systems Science (forthcoming, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hofstede, G.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill Book Company, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, Y., Kim, S.Y.: The Influence of Cultural Values on Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of Hofstede’s Dimensions to Korean Public Relations Practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics 91(4), 485–500 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Turker, D.: Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study. Journal of Business Ethics (85), 411–427 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morhardt, J.E., Baird, S., Freeman, K.: Scoring Corporate Environmental and Sustainability Reports Using Gri 2000, ISO 14031 and Other Criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9, 215–233 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gebauer, J., Hoffmann, E.: Evaluating extra-financial reporting: The case of the German ranking of sustainability reports. Journal of Applied Accounting Research 10(3), 224–234 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elliott, W.B., Hodge, F.D., Kennedy, J.J., Pronk, M.: Are M.B.A. Students a Good Proxy for Nonprofessional Investors? The Accounting Review 82(1), 139–168 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., Ruiz, S. (2011). Information Systems for Sustainability: Hofstede’s Cultural Differences in the Perception of a Quality Measure for Sustainability Reports. In: Cruz-Cunha, M.M., Varajão, J., Powell, P., Martinho, R. (eds) ENTERprise Information Systems. CENTERIS 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 219. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24358-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24358-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24357-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24358-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics