Skip to main content

Manual Annotation, 3-D Shape Reconstruction, and Traumatic Brain Injury Analysis

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7012))

Abstract

Bitmask drawing is still the established standard for manual annotation of brain structures by experts. To alleviate problems such as bitmask inconsistencies between slices that lead to jagged contours in corresponding orthogonal cross-sections, we propose a 2-D spline-based contour editing tool in combination with a new algorithm for surface reconstruction from 3-D point clouds. This approach uses a new implicit surface formulation that adapts to the local density of points. We show that manual segmentation of the brainstem, cerebellum, corpus callosum, caudate, putamen, hippocampus and thalamus can be performed with high reproducibility in Magnetic Resonance (MR) data and sufficient accuracy to analyze volume changes for mild Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) patients. In addition, we show that the new surface reconstruction method allows to reconstruct the shape of brain structures such as the brainstem better than other established surface reconstruction approaches. Our tool can, therefore, not only be used for volume measurements, but may also be used to assess local shape changes of brain structures going along with the progression of neuro-degenerative diseases such as TBI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes, J., Foster, J., Boyes, R., Pepple, T., Moore, E., Schott, J., Frost, C., Scahill, R., Fox, N.: A comparison of methods for the automated calculation of volumes and atrophy rates in the hippocampus. Neuroimage 40(4), 1655–1671 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fischl, B., Salat, D., Busa, E., Albert, M., Dieterich, M., Haselgrove, C., van der Kouwe, A., Killiany, R., Kennedy, D., Klaveness, S., et al.: Whole brain segmentation automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33(3), 341–355 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guennebaud, G., Gross, M.: Algebraic point set surfaces. In: ACM SIGGRAPH, pp. 23–31. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hoppe, H., DeRose, T., Duchamp, T., McDonald, J., Stuetzle, W.: Surface reconstruction from unorganized points. In: Proc. SIGGRAPH, pp. 163–169 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kazhdan, M., Bolitho, M., Hoppe, H.: Poisson surface reconstruction. In: Polthier, K., Sheffer, A. (eds.) Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morey, R., Petty, C., Xu, Y., Pannu Hayes, J., Wagner, H., Lewis, D., LaBar, K., Styner, M., McCarthy, G.: A comparison of automated segmentation and manual tracing for quantifying hippocampal and amygdala volumes. NeuroImage 45(3), 855–866 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mortenson, M.E.: Geometric Modeling. Wiley Press, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oztireli, A., Guennebaud, G., Gross, M.: Feature preserving point set surfaces based on non-linear kernel regression. Computer Graphics Forum 28(2), 493–501 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patenaude, B., Smith, S., Kennedy, D., Jenkinson, M.: First-fmrib’s integrated registration and segmentation tool. In: Human Brain Mapping Conference (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schroeder, W., Martin, K., Lorenson, B.: The Visualization Toolkit, 3rd edn. Kitware Inc. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shrout, P., Fleiss, J.: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 86(2), 420–428 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zagorchev, L., Goshtasby, A., Paulsen, K., McAllister, T., Young, S., Weese, J. (2011). Manual Annotation, 3-D Shape Reconstruction, and Traumatic Brain Injury Analysis. In: Liu, T., Shen, D., Ibanez, L., Tao, X. (eds) Multimodal Brain Image Analysis. MBIA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7012. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24446-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24446-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24445-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24446-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics