Skip to main content

Towards Quality Driven Exploration of Model Transformation Spaces

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6981))

Abstract

Verifying that a software system has certain non-functional properties is a primary concern in many engineering fields. Although several model-driven approaches exist to predict quality attributes from system models, they still lack the proper level of automation envisioned by Model Driven Software Development. When a potential issue concerning non-functional properties is discovered, the identification of a solution is still entirely up to the engineer and to his/her experience. This paper presents QVT-Rational, our multi-modeling solution to automate the detection-solution loop. We leverage and extend existing model transformation techniques with constructs to elicit the space of the alternative solutions and to bind quality properties to them. Our framework is highly customizable, it supports the definition of non-functional requirements and provides an engine to automatically explore the solution space. We evaluate our approach by applying it to two well-known software engineering problems — Object-Relational Mapping and components allocation — and by showing how several solutions that satisfy given performance requirements can be automatically identified.

This research was partially founded by the European Commission IDEAS-ERC Project 227977-SMScom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aleti, A., Bjornander, S., Grunske, L., Meedeniya, I.: Archeopterix: An extendable tool for architecture optimization of aadl models. In: MOMPES. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alur, D., Crupi, J., Malks, D.: Core J2EE patterns: best practices and design strategies. Sun Microsystems Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, S., Koziolek, H., Reussner, R.: Model-based performance prediction with the palladio component model. In: WOSP. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bures, T., Carlson, J., Crnkovic, J., Sentilles, S., Vulgarakis, A.: Procom - the progress component model reference manual, version 1.0. Tech. Rep. MHD-MRTC-230/2008-1-SE, Malardalen University (June 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Canfora, G., Penta, M.D., Esposito, R., Villani, M.L.: An approach for qos-aware service composition based on genetic algorithms. In: GECCO. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ciancone, A., Filieri, A., Drago, M.L., Mirandola, R., Grassi, V.: KlaperSuite: An integrated model-driven environment for reliability and performance analysis of component-based systems. In: Bishop, J., Vallecillo, A. (eds.) TOOLS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6705, pp. 99–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cortellessa, V., Martens, A., Reussner, R., Trubiani, C.: A process to effectively identify “Guilty” performance antipatterns. In: Rosenblum, D.S., Taentzer, G. (eds.) FASE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6013, pp. 368–382. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Drago, M.L., Ghezzi, C., Mirandola, R.: A quality driven extension to the qvt-relations transformation language. In: CSRD. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) (submitted to), http://home.dei.polimi.it/drago/qvtrr.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  9. Insfrán, E., Gonzalez-Huerta, J., Abrahão, S.: Design guidelines for the development of quality-driven model transformations. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) MODELS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6395, pp. 288–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, E.K., Kang, E., Dahlweid, M., Seifert, D., Santen, T.: Components, platforms and possibilities: Towards generic automation for mda. In: EMSOFT. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kurtev, I.: Adaptability of Model Transformations. Ph.D. thesis, Unversity of Twente, Twente, Netherlands (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lau, S.Q., Czarnecki, K.: Domain Analysis of E-Commerce Systems Using Feature-Based Model Templates. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lazowska, E.D., Zahorjan, J., Graham, G.S., Sevcik, K.C.: Quantitative System Performance: Computer System Analysis Using Queueing Network Models. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martens, A., Koziolek, H., Becker, S., Reussner, R.: Automatically improve software architecture models for performance, reliability, and cost using evolutionary algorithms. In: WOSP/SIPEW (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McGregor, J.D., Bachmann, F., Bass, L., Bianco, P., Klein, M.: Using arche in the classroom: One experience. Tech. Rep. SEI-2007-TN-001, CMU (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merilinna, J.: A Tool for Quality-Driven Architecture Model Transformation. Ph.D. thesis, VVT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Vuorimiehentie, Finland (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Neema, S., Sztipanovits, J., Karsai, G., Butts, K.: Constraint-based design-space exploration and model synthesis. In: Alur, R., Lee, I. (eds.) EMSOFT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2855, pp. 290–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Object Management Group (OMG): Mof qvt specification 1.0 (April 2008), http://www.omg.org/spec/QVT/1.0

  19. Parsons, T.: A framework for detecting performance design and deployment antipatterns in component based enterprise systems. In: DSM. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pohl, K., Böckle, G., van der Linden, F.J.: Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Saxena, T., Karsai, G.: MDE-based approach for generalizing design space exploration. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) MODELS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6394, pp. 46–60. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G.: Performance solutions: a practical guide to creating responsive, scalable software. Addison Wesley, Reading (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Woodside, M., Petriu, D.C., Petriu, D.B., Shen, H., Israr, T., Merseguer, J.: Performance by unified model analysis (puma). In: WOSP. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, J.: Rule-based automatic software performance diagnosis and improvement. In: WOSP. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Drago, M.L., Ghezzi, C., Mirandola, R. (2011). Towards Quality Driven Exploration of Model Transformation Spaces. In: Whittle, J., Clark, T., Kühne, T. (eds) Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. MODELS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6981. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24485-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24485-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24484-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24485-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics