Skip to main content

The Need of a Semantic Layer between UMLS and Biomedical Information Systems

  • Conference paper
  • 1090 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 240))

Abstract

Since biomedical information is scattered among a number of semantically or syntactically incompatible independent systems, a contemporary pragmatic approach is proposed in this study to make use of a semantic middle layer and common standards for information exchange between these systems. Biological and medical terminologies and ontologies take vital part in the background of life sciences information systems and the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) is an inclusive source for biomedical vocabulary. Taking this fact into account, the need of new tools, which transform whole or part of UMLS content to a semantically sharable and reusable format, is also revealed to support knowledge-intensive biomedical actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Humphreys, B.L., Lindberg, D.A.B., Schoolman, H.M., Barnett, G.O.: The Unified Medical Language System: An informatics research collaboration. Jamia 5(1), 1–11 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McCray, A.T.: An upper-level ontology for the biomedical domain. Comp. Func. Genom. 4, 80–84 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. National Library of Medicine, The Future of the UMLS Semantic Network Workshop, Bethesda, Maryland (April 2005), http://mor.nlm.nih.gov/snw/

  4. Schuyler, P.L., Hole, W.T., Tuttle, M.S., Sherertz, D.D.: The UMLS Metathesaurus: representing different views of biomedical concepts. Bull Med. Libr. Assoc. 81(2), 217–222 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fan, J.W., Friedman, C.: Semantic classification of biomedical concepts using distributional similarity. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(4), 467–477 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fa, J.W., Xu, H., Friedman, C.: Using contextual and lexical features to restructure and validate the classification of biomedical concepts. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 264 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. National Library of Medicine, Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) 2011AA Release. National Library of Medicine Technical Bulletin November-December (2011), http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/mj11/mj11_umls_2011aa_release.html

  8. U.S. National Library of Medicine, The Unified Medical Language System, UMLS Reference Manual, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9676/

  9. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web - A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, S.L., Yang, C.W.: Designing a semantic bliki system to support different types of knowledge and adaptive learning. Computers & Education 53, 701–712 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stroetmann, V.N., Rodrigues, J.M., et al.: Conceptual Framework for eHealth Interoperability. Semantic Health International Project (2007), http://www.semantichealth.org/DELIVERABLES/SemanticHEALTH_D1_1_finalC.pdf

  12. Rubin, D.L., Lewis, S.E., Mungall, C.J., et al.: National Center for Biomedical Ontology: Advancing biomedicine through structured organization of scientific knowledge. OMICS-A Journal of Integrative Biology 10(2), 185–198 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: W3C, OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  14. Lezcano, L., Sicilia, M.A., Rodrguez-Solano, C.: Integrating reasoning and clinical archetypes using OWL ontologies and SWRL rules. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 44(2), 343–353 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jimenez-Ruiz, E.: The UMLS Semantic Network in OWL, http://krono.act.uji.es/people/Ernesto/UMLS_SN_OWL

  16. Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L.J., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C.J., OBI Consortium, Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Ruttenberg, A., Sansone, S.A., Scheuermann, R.H., Shah, N., Whetzel, P.L., Lewis, S.: The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat. Biotechnol. 25(11), 1251–1255 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bodenreider, O., Bean, C.A.: Relationships among knowledge structures: Vocabulary Integration within a subject domain. In: Bean, C.A., Green, R. (eds.) Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge, ch. 6. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rebholz-Schuhmann, D., Nenadic, G.: Biomedical Semantics: the Hub for Biomedical Research 2.0. J. Biomed Semantics 1(1) (March 2010), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2895735/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Özdemir, B.G., Baykal, N. (2011). The Need of a Semantic Layer between UMLS and Biomedical Information Systems. In: García-Barriocanal, E., Cebeci, Z., Okur, M.C., Öztürk, A. (eds) Metadata and Semantic Research. MTSR 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 240. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24731-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24731-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24730-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24731-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics