Skip to main content

Risks, Benefits and Revelations: An Exploratory Study of Doctoral Students’ Perceptions of Open Access Theses in Institutional Repositories

  • Conference paper
Book cover Digital Libraries: For Cultural Heritage, Knowledge Dissemination, and Future Creation (ICADL 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7008))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2136 Accesses

Abstract

This exploratory study examined doctoral students’ awareness of and attitudes towards open access (OA) particularly in relation to institutional repositories (IR). Levels of students’ awareness of OA and the concept of IRs, publishing behaviour, and perceived benefits and risks of OA publishing were explored. The study also examined students’ willingness to comply with mandatory submission policies. The study sample was drawn from Massey University, one of the two universities in New Zealand which has had a mandatory submission policy in place since 2007.Qualitative and quantitative data was collected from doctoral students in two stages: first through a series of qualitative interviews with students from different disciplines, followed by self-completion questionnaires collected from a larger sample. In this paper, we discuss and highlight a number of potential strategies for raising awareness and for improving understanding of the benefits of OA IR to encourage acceptance and adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Crow, R.: The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper (2002), http://scholarship.utm.edu/20/1/SPARC_102.pdf

  2. Bethesda Statement on open access publishing (2003), http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm

  3. Sale, A.: The acquisition of open access research articles. First Monday 11(9) (2006), http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_10/sale/index.html

  4. Pickton, M., McKnight, C.: Research students and the Loughborough institutional repository. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 38(4), 203–219 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Palmer, C.L., Teffeau, L.C., Newton, M.P.: Strategies for institutional repository development: A case study of three evolving initiatives. Library Trends 57(2), 142–167 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kingsley, D.: Those who don’t look don’t find: Disciplinary considerations in repository advocacy. OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives 24(4), 204–218 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cullen, R., Chawner, B.: Institutional repositories and the role of academic libraries in scholarly communication. Paper Presented at the Asia-Pacific Conference on Library Education and Practice, Japan, March 6-8 (2009a), http://hdl.handle.net/10063/866

  8. Performance-Based Research Fund Sector Reference Group (n.d.). Performance-Based Research Fund Sector Reference Group review: Managing nominated research outputs. TEC, Wellington, NZ

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, P.M., Connolly, M.J.L.: Evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University’s installation of DSpace. D-Lib Magazine 21 (2007), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html

  10. Gadd, E., Loddington, S., Oppenheim, C.: A comparison of academics’ attitudes towards the rights protection of their research and teaching materials. Journal of Information Science 33(6), 686–701 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. White, B.: Minding our ps and qs: Issues of property, provenance, quantity and quality in institutional repositories. Paper Presented at the International Association of Technological University Libraries (IAUTL) Conference 2008 (2008), http://hdl.handle.net/10179/645

  12. Jones, R., Andrew, T.: Open access, open source and e-theses: The development of the Edinburgh Research Archive. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 39(3), 198–212 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Troman, A., Jacobs, N., Copeland, S.: A new electronic service for UK theses: Access transformed by EThOS. Interlending & Document Supply 35(3), 157–163 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pickton, M., McKnight, C.: Is there a role for research students in an institutional repository? Some repository managers’ views. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 39, 153–161 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Homans, G.C.: Social behavior as exchange. The American Journal of Sociology 63(6), 597–606 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cullen, R., Chawner, B.: National Survey: Perceptions of New Zealand academic staff towards institutional repositories (2009b), http://www.oarinz.ac.nz/oarinzwiki/index.php?n=OARiNZ.NationalSurveyPerceptionsOfNewZealandAcademicStaffTowardsInstitutionalRepositoriesSeptember2009

  18. Swan, A., Brown, S.: Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing 17, 219–224 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. White, B., Gendall, R., Naidoo, K.: No end in sight: Information skills for academics and researchers. Paper Published in the Proceedings of the 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference, Yeppoon, Queensland, Australia (2004), http://hdl.handle.net/10179/965

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stanton, K.V., Liew, C.L. (2011). Risks, Benefits and Revelations: An Exploratory Study of Doctoral Students’ Perceptions of Open Access Theses in Institutional Repositories. In: Xing, C., Crestani, F., Rauber, A. (eds) Digital Libraries: For Cultural Heritage, Knowledge Dissemination, and Future Creation. ICADL 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7008. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24826-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24826-9_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24825-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24826-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics