Skip to main content

Pseudo-classical Nonseparability and Mass Politics in Two-Party Systems

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7052))

Abstract

We expand the substantive terrain of QI’s reach by illuminating a body of political theory that to date has been elaborated in strictly classical language and formalisms but has complex features that seem to merit generalizations of the problem outside the confines of classicality. The line of research, initiated by Fiorina in the 1980s, seeks to understand the origins and nature of party governance in two-party political systems wherein voters cast partisan ballots in two contests, one that determines partisan control of the executive branch and another that determines party control of a legislature. We describe how research in this area evolved in the last two decades in directions that bring it now to the point where further elaboration and study seem natural in the more general formalistic and philosophical environments embraced in QI research. In the process, we find evidence that a restriction of a classical model that has animated work in the field appears violated in a form that leads one naturally to embrace the superposition principle. We then connect classical distinctions between separable and nonseparable preferences that are common in political science to their quantum and quantum-like counterparts in the QI literature, finding special affinity for a recently-introduced understanding of the distinction that provides a passageway into the boundary between fully quantum and fully classical views of the distinction and thereby provides new leverage on existing work germane to the theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fiorina, M.P.: Divided Government, 2nd edn. MacMillan, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Downs, A.: An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Converse, P.E.: The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In: Apter, D. (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. Free Press, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Petrocik, J., Doherty, J.: The Road to Divided Government: Paved without Intention. In: Galderisi, P.F., Herzberg, R.Q., McNamara, P. (eds.) Divided Government: Change, Uncertainty, and the Constitutional Order. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carsey, T., Layman, G.: Policy Balancing and Preferences for Party Control of Government. Political Research Quarterly 57, 541–550 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith Jr., C.E., Brown, R.D., Bruce, J.M., Marvin Overby, L.: Party Balancing and Voting for Congress in the 1996 National Election. American Journal of Political Science 43, 737–764 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dean, L., Niou, E.M.S.: Elections in Double-Member Districts with Nonseparable Preferences. Journal of Theoretical Politics 10, 89–110 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Enelow, J.M., Hinich, M.J.: The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hinich, M.J., Munger, M.C.: Analytical Politics. Cambridge University Press, New York (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, O., Hinich, M.: On the Power and Importance of the Mean Preference in a Mathematical Model of Democratic Choice. Public Choice 5, 59–72 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorman, W.: The Structure of Utility Functions. Review of Economic Studies 32, 369–390 (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwartz, T.: Collective Choice, Separation of Issues and Vote Trading. American Political Science Review 71, 999–1010 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lacy, D.: A Theory of Nonseparable Preferences in Survey Responses. American Journal of Political Science 45, 239–258 (2001a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lacy, D.: Nonseparable Preferences, Measurement Error, and Unstable Survey Responses. Political Analysis 9, 95–115 (2001b)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W., Stokes, D.: The American Voter. Wiley, New York (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aerts, D., Aerts, S., Broeckaert, J., Gabora, L.: The Violation of Bell Inequalities in the Macroworld. Foundations of Physics 30, 1378–1414 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A Theory of Concepts and Their Combinations II: A Hilbert Space Representation. Kybernetes 34, 176–205 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Bruza, P., Iqbal, A., Kitto, K.: The Role of Non-Factorizability in Determining ‘Pseudo-Classical’ Non-Separability. In: Quantum Informantics for Cognitive, Social, and Semantic Processes: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium (2010), pp. 26–31 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gabora, L., Aerts, D.: A Model of the Emergence and Evolution of Integrated Worldviews. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 53, 434–451 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Bruza, P.D., Kitto, K., Ramm, B., Sitbon, L., Song, D., Blomberg, S.: Quantum-like Non-Separability of Concept Combinations, Emergent Associates and Abduction. Logic Journal of the IGPL (2011) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Born, M.: Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. Zeitschrift für Physik 37, 863–867 (1926)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Busemeyer, J., Pothos, E., Franco, R., Trueblood, J.: A Quantum Theoretical Explanation for Probability Judgment ‘Errors’. Psychological Review (2011) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Trueblood, J., Busemeyer, J.: A Quantum Probability Explanation for Order Effects on Inference. Cognitive Science (2011) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weisberg, H.: A Multidimensional Conception of Party Identification. Political Behavior 2, 33–60 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zorn, C., Smith, C.E. (2011). Pseudo-classical Nonseparability and Mass Politics in Two-Party Systems. In: Song, D., Melucci, M., Frommholz, I., Zhang, P., Wang, L., Arafat, S. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7052. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24971-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24971-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24970-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24971-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics