Skip to main content

WSPOM: An Ontology Model for Web Service Planning

  • Conference paper
Information Computing and Applications (ICICA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7030))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2441 Accesses

Abstract

With the growth of web services’ quantity and complexity, the problem that whether the existing web services could satisfy the requirements of business has become more complex. Based on the OWL, WSPOM (Web Service Planning Ontology Model) is proposed, WSPOM consists of General Ontology, Task Ontology and Web Service Ontology. First, the General Ontology is built up to describe the state of the world and the changes each Operation could make to the world. The changes are described in graph difference vector. Then one satisfactory relation all over the ontology model is proposed. Based on the satisfactory relation, whether the web service could satisfy the business demand will be validated, then the Web Service Grounding would be generated in WSDL or code stub. Then one framework is developed based on WSPOM, the result shows that the framework proposed could resolve the problem efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Manola, F., Miller, E.: RDF Primer, W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brickley, D., Guha, R.V.: RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema W3C Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hitzler, P.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer, W3C Recommendation, October 27 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. WSMO: Web Service Modeling Ontology D2v1.3, http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d2/v1.3/

  5. Akkiraju, R., Farrell, J.: Web Service Semantics - WSDL-S, W3C Member Submission, November 7 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services, http://www.w3.org/Submission/OWL-S/

  7. Li, N., Cai, H.: Functionality semantic indexing and matching method for RESTful Web Services based on resource state descriptions. In: 2nd International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schepers, T.G.J.: A lifecycle approach to SOA governance. In: SAC 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, M., Zhang, L.-j.: Practical SOA: Service Modeling. In: Enterprise Service Bus and Governance in ICWS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bouillet, E., Feblowitz, M., Liu, Z., Ranganathan, A., Riabov, A.: A Knowledge Engineering and Planning Framework based on OWL Ontologies. In: ICKEPS 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liu, L., Cai, H. (2011). WSPOM: An Ontology Model for Web Service Planning. In: Liu, B., Chai, C. (eds) Information Computing and Applications. ICICA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7030. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25255-6_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25255-6_57

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25254-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25255-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics