Skip to main content

Usability Evaluation of Digital Dictation Procedure - An Interaction Analysis Approach

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7058))

Abstract

This paper introduces a usability study of digital dictation procedure in which a task-originating modelling method, called interaction sequence illustration (ISI), was used for analysing interaction steps and stages. The analysis was conducted from the physician’s viewpoint in a real-life clinical environment. Study results showed that the observed process of digital dictation is inefficient and unnecessarily lengthy. The analysis also revealed a number of interaction design failures and complex interaction sequences. In the study the ISI approach is suitable for providing concrete and detailed information about the steps and stages of interaction, the usability of user interfaces, and the success of interaction design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Khangura, S., Grimsha, J., Mohe, D.: Evidence Summary: Electronic Health Records (EHRs). Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, http://www.ohri.ca/kta/docs/KTA-EHR-Evidence-Review.pdf (accessed July 01, 2011)

  2. Black, A.D., Car, J., Pagliari, C., Anandan, C., Cresswell, K., Bokun, T., McKinstry, B., Procter, R., Majeed, A., Sheikh, A.: The Impact of eHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview. PLoS Med. 18 (2011), http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000387 (accessed July 01, 2011)

  3. Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M.B., Stage, J.A.: Longitudinal Study of Usability in Health Care: Does Time Heal? Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 130, 181–191 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards, P.J., Moloney, K.P., Jacko, J.A., Sainfort, F.: Evaluating Usability of a Commercial Electronic Health Record: A Case Study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 718–728 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peute, L.W.P., Jaspers, M.W.M.: The Significance of a Usability Evaluation of an Emerging Laboratory Order Entry System. International Journal of Medical Informatics 76, 157–168 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Viitanen, J.: Redesigning Digital Dictation for Physicians: A User-centred Approach. Health Informatics Journal 15, 179–190 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., Kawasumi, Y.: The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Time Efficiency of Physicians and Nurses: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Medical Information Association 12(5), 505–516 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holden, R.J.: Physicians’ Beliefs about Using EMR and CPOE: In Pursuit of a Contextual Understanding of Health IT Use Behavior. International Journal of Medical Informatics 79, 71–80 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reuss, E., Naef, P., Keller, R., Norrie, M.: Physicians’ and Nurses’ Documenting Practices and Implications for Electronic Patient Record Design. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2007. LNCS, vol. 4799, pp. 113–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Braun, L.M.M., Wiesman, F., van der Herik, H.J., Hasman, A., Korsten, E.: Towards Patient-related Information Needs. International Journal of Medical Informatics 76, 246–251 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holzinger, A., Ackerl, S., Searle, G., Sorantin, E.: Speech Recognition in Daily Hospital Practice: Human-computer Interaction Lessons Learned. In: Lanyi, S. (ed.) Central European Multimedia and Virtual Reality Conference CEMVRC 2004, pp. 125–134. University of Veszprém Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ISO 9241-210. International standard: Ergonomics of human-system interaction, Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. First edition 2010-03-15. Reference number ISO 9241-210:2010(E)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Beyer, H., Holzblatt, K.: Contextual Design: Defining Customer-centered Systems. Academic Press, San Diego (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beuscart-Zéphir, M.C., Brender, J., Beuscart, R., Ménager-Depriester, I.: Cognitive Evaluation: How to Assess the Usability of Information Technology in Healthcare. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 54, 19–28 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kushniruk, A.W., Patel, V.L.: Cognitive and Usability Engineering Methods for the Evaluation of Clinical Information Systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 37, 56–76 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaspers, M.W.M.: A Comparison of Usability Methods for Testing Interactive Technologies: Methodological Aspects and Empirical Evidence. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78, 340–353 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Janß, A., Lauer, W., Radermacher, K.: Cognitive Task Analysis for Prospective Usability Evaluation in Computer-Assisted Surgery. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2007. LNCS, vol. 4799, pp. 349–356. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Horsky, J., Kaufman, D.R., Oppenheim, M.I., Patel, V.L.: A Framework for Analyzing the Cognitive Complexity of Computer-assisted Clinical Ordering. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 4, 4–22 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Belden, J.L., Grayson, R., Barnes, J.: Defining and Testing EMR Usability: Principles and Proposed Methods of EMR Usability Evaluation and Rating. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) EHR Task Force (June 2009), http://www.himss.org/content/files/HIMSS_DefiningandTestingEMRUsability.pdf (accessed July 01, 2011)

  20. Bastien, J.M.C.: Usability Testing: A Review of Some Methodological and Technical Aspects of the Method. International Journal of Medical Informatics 79, e18–e23 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Følstad, A., Hornbæk, K.: Work-domain Knowledge in Usability Evaluation: Experiences with Cooperative Usability Testing. The Journal of Systems and Software 83, 2019–2030 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. González, M.P., Lorés, J., Granollers, A.: Enhancing Usability Testing through Datamining Techniques: A Novel Approach to Detecting Usability Problem Patterns for a Context of Use. Information and Software Technology 50, 547–568 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alsos, O.A., Dahl, Y.: Towards a Best Practice for Laboratory-based Usability Evaluations of Mobile ICT for Hospitals. In: NordiHCI 2008, Lund, Sweden, pp. 3–12. ACM Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Svanæs, D., Alsos, O.A., Dahl, Y.: Usability Testing of Mobile ICT for Clinical Settings: Methodological and Practical Challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics 79, e24–e34 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Horsky, J., McColgan, K., Pang, J.E., Melnikas, A.J., Linder, J.-A., Schinipper, J.L., Middleton, B.: Complementary Methods of System Usability Evaluation: Surveys and Observations During Software Design and Development Cycles. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 43, 782–790 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C., Polson, P.: The Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A Practitioner’s Guide. In: Nielsen, J., Mack, R. (eds.) Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego (1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ryu, H., Monk, A.: Analysing Interaction Problems with Cyclic Interaction Theory: Low-level Interaction Walkthrough. PsychNology Journal 2, 304–330 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thimbleby, H.: Interaction Walkthrough: Evaluation of Safety Critical Interactive Systems. In: Doherty, G., Blandford, A. (eds.) DSVIS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4323, pp. 52–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Viitanen, J., Nieminen, M. (2011). Usability Evaluation of Digital Dictation Procedure - An Interaction Analysis Approach. In: Holzinger, A., Simonic, KM. (eds) Information Quality in e-Health. USAB 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7058. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25363-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25364-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics