Skip to main content

Diagnosis of Multi-Agent Systems and Its Application to Public Administration

  • Conference paper
Business Information Systems Workshops (BIS 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 97))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we present a model-based diagnosis view on the complex social systems in which large public administration organizations operate. The purpose of diagnosis as presented in this paper is to identify agent role instances that are not conforming to expectations in a multi-agent system (MAS). To this end, we introduce model-based diagnosis of an imperfectly observable multi-agent system. We propose the model-based diagnosis problem as an explanation of major driving forces behind policy making, and requests for change to IT and business process design departments, in public administration. This makes model-based diagnosis a useful legal knowledge acquisition model for public administration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boella, G., Pigozzi, G., van der Torre, L.: Five guidelines for normative multiagent systems. In: Proceeding of the 2009 Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, pp. 21–30. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boer, A., van Engers, T.: Generic problem solving tasks and agent roles in public administration. In: Winkels, R. (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. Jurix 2010: The Twenty-Third Annual Conference. IOS Press (December 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boer, A., van Engers, T.: Knowledge acquisition in public administration. In: Cimiano, P., Pinto, H.S. (eds.) EKAW 2010. LNCS, vol. 6317, Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boer, A., van Engers, T.: An agent-based legal knowledge acquisition methodology for agile public administration. In: ICAIL 2011: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM, New York (to be published, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bordini, R., Hübner, J., Vieira, R.: Jason and the golden fleece of agent-oriented programming. In: Weiss, G., Bordini, R., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) Multi-Agent Programming, Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, And Simulated Organizations, vol. 15, pp. 3–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2005), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26350-0-1 , doi:10.1007/0-387-26350-0-1

    Google Scholar 

  6. Breuker, J.: Components of problem solving and types of problems. In: Steels, L., Van de Velde, W., Schreiber, G. (eds.) EKAW 1994. LNCS, vol. 867, pp. 118–136. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Chandrasekaran, B., Johnson, T.R.: Generic tasks and task structures: History, critique and new directions. In: David, J.M., Krivine, J.P., Simmons, R. (eds.) Second Generation Expert Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clancey, W.J.: Heuristic classification. Artificial Intelligence 27, 289–350 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dastani, M.M., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Hulstijn, J., Dignum, F.P.M., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Enacting and deacting roles in agent programming. In: Odell, J.J., Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P. (eds.) AOSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3382, pp. 189–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321–357 (1995), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TYF-4031CDM-P/2/b6a314405d7de8cafd03b1f4f457235e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fonagy, P., Target, M.: Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization. Development and Psychopathology 9(04), 679–700 (1997), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579497001399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gong, Y., Janssen, M.: Agent-based simulation for evaluating flexible and agile business processes: Separating knowledge rules, process rules and information resources. In: Aalst, W., Mylopoulos, J., Sadeh, N.M., Shaw, M.J., Szyperski, C., Barjis, J. (eds.) EOMAS 2010. LNBIP, vol. 63, pp. 41–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2010), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15723-3-4 , 10.1007

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gong, Y., Overbeek, S., Janssen, M.: Business rules for creating process flexibility: Mapping RIF rules and BDI rules. In: 1st International Workshop on Web Intelligent Systems and Services, WISS 2010 (in print, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grandon Gill, T.: Early expert systems: Where are they now? MIS Quarterly 19(1), 51–81 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Greiner, R., Smith, B.A., Wilkerson, R.W.: A correction to the algorithm in reiter’s theory of diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence 41(1), 79–88 (1989), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TYF-47WTTF0-69/2/f6804b2a121735af3b2a03c9b440e121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jennings, N.R.: Commitments and conventions: The foundation of coordination in multiagent systems. Knowledge Engineering Review (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kalech, M., Kaminka, G.A.: On the design of coordination diagnosis algorithms for teams of situated agents. Artificial Intelligence 171(8-9), 491–513 (2007), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TYF-4NB99GY-2/2/1011c067c72d15338a29a6c0657ae8da

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Reiter, R.: A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artificial Intelligence 32(1), 57–95 (1987), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TYF-47WTTBS-4T/2/b2d7b5acbca6116be93d292e56ee81aa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Roos, N., ten Teije, A., Witteveen, C.: A protocol for multi-agent diagnosis with spatially distributed knowledge. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2003, pp. 655–661. ACM, New York (2003), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/860575.860681

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh, P.: Examining the society of mind. Computing and Informatics 22, 521–543 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steels, L.: Components of expertise. AI Mag. 11(2), 30–49 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Witteveen, C., Roos, N., van der Krogt, R., de Weerdt, M.: Diagnosis of single and multi-agent plans. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2005, pp. 805–812. ACM, New York (2005), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1082473.1082596

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boer, A., van Engers, T. (2011). Diagnosis of Multi-Agent Systems and Its Application to Public Administration. In: Abramowicz, W., Maciaszek, L., Węcel, K. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 97. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25370-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25370-6_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25369-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25370-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics