Skip to main content

Analysis of Bluffing Behavior in Human-Humanoid Poker Game

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7072))

Abstract

This paper presents the analysis of human nonverbal responses and betting decision in terms of bluffing and the comparison between human-human poker game and human-robot poker game. According to a given situation manipulated with the card hand strength, we explored how different the participants change bluff decision between strong hand and weak hand and how different the participants use a bluff between a human-human and human-robot poker game. Furthermore, we analyzed the significant correlation between the card hand strength and human behaviors and obtained the regression model to predict the card hand strength from nonverbal behaviors and bluff decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wainer, J., Feil-Seifer, D.J., Shell, D.A., Mataric, M.J.: The Role of Physical Embodiment in Human-Robot Interaction. The 15th IEEE Int. Symp. on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 117–122 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, K.M., Jung, Y., Kim, J., Kim, S.R.: Are Physically Embodied Social Agents Better than Disembodied Social Agents?: The Effects of Physical Embodiment, Tactile Interaction, and People’s Loneliness in Human-Robot Interaction. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 64(10), 962–973 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bainbridge, W.A., Hart, J.W., Kim, E.S., Scassellati, B.: The Effect of Presence on Human-Robot Interaction. In: 17th IEEE Int. Sym. on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, ROMAN 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Imai, M., Ono, T.: Body Movement Analysis of Human-Robot Interaction. Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence 18, 177–182 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baumeister, R.F.: A Self-presentational View of Social Phenomena. Psychological Bulletin 91(1), 3–26 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schlenker, B.R., Pontari, B.A.: The Strategic Control of Information: Impression Management and Self-presentation in Daily Life. In: Tesser, A., Felson, R.B., Suls, J.M. (eds.) Psychological Perspectives on Self and Identity, pp. 199–232 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, M.G., Suzuki, K.: A Card Playing Humanoid for Understanding Socio-emotional Interaction. In: Yang, H.S., Malaka, R., Hoshino, J., Han, J.H. (eds.) ICEC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6243, pp. 9–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelley, J.F.: An Iterative Design Methodology for User-Friendly Natural Language Office Information Applications. ACM Trans. on Office Information Systems 2(1), 26–41 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hayano, D.M.: Communicative Competency among Poker Players. J. of Communication 30(2), 99–104 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ambadar, Z., Schooler, J.W., Cohn, J.F.: Deciphering the Enigmatic Face: the Importance of Facial Dynamics in Interpreting Subtle Facial Expressions. Psychol. Sci. 16(5), 403–410 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Valstar, M.F., Pantic, M., Ambadar, Z., Cohn, J.F.: Spontaneous vs. Posed Facial Behavior: Automatic Analysis of Brow Actions. In: 8th Int. Conf. on Multimodal Interfaces, pp. 162–170 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K.P., Bull, R.: Detecting Deceit via Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior. J. of Nonverbal Behavior 24(4), 239–263 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fukuda, K.: Eye Blinks: New Indices for the Detection of Deception. Int. J. of Psychophysiology 40(3), 239–245 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Carlton, K., Cooper, H.: Cues to Deception. Psychological bulletin 129(1), 74–118 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, MG., Suzuki, K. (2011). Analysis of Bluffing Behavior in Human-Humanoid Poker Game. In: Mutlu, B., Bartneck, C., Ham, J., Evers, V., Kanda, T. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7072. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25504-5_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25503-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25504-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics