Skip to main content

On Modeling Rank-Independent Risk in Estimating Probability of Relevance

  • Conference paper
Information Retrieval Technology (AIRS 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7097))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Estimating the probability of relevance for a document is fundamental in information retrieval. From a theoretical point of view, risk exists in the estimation process, in the sense that the estimated probabilities may not be the actual ones precisely. The estimation risk is often considered to be dependent on the rank. For example, the probability ranking principle assumes that ranking documents in the order of decreasing probability of relevance can optimize the rank effectiveness. This implies that a precise estimation can yield an optimal rank. However, an optimal (or even ideal) rank does not always guarantee that the estimated probabilities are precise. This means that part of the estimation risk is rank-independent. It imposes practical risks in the applications, such as pseudo relevance feedback, where different estimated probabilities of relevance in the first-round retrieval will make a difference even when two ranks are identical. In this paper, we will explore the effect and the modeling of such rank-independent risk. A risk management method is proposed to adaptively adjust the rank-independent risk. Experimental results on several TREC collections demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed models for both pseudo-relevance feedback and relevance feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Croft, W.B., Cronen-Townsend, S., Lavrenko, V.: Relevance feedback and personalization: A language modeling perspective. In: DELOS Workshop: Personalisation and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dillon, J.V., Collins-Thompson, K.: A unified optimization framework for robust pseudo-relevance feedback algorithms. In: CIKM, pp. 1069–1078 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lafferty, J.D., Zhai, C.: Document language models, query models, and risk minimization for information retrieval. In: SIGIR, pp. 111–119 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lafferty, J.D., Zhai, C.: Probabilistic relevance models based on document and query generation. In: Language Modeling and Information Retrieval, pp. 1–10 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lavrenko, V., Croft, W.B.: Relevance-based language models. In: SIGIR, pp. 120–127 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lv, Y., Zhai, C.: Adaptive relevance feedback in information retrieval. In: CIKM, pp. 255–264 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manmatha, R., Rath, T., Feng, F.: Modeling score distributions for combining the outputs of search engines. In: SIGIR, pp. 267–275 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maron, M.E., Kuhns, J.L.: On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval. J. ACM 7, 216–244 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogilvie, P., Callan, J.: Experiments using the lemur toolkit. In: TREC 2002, pp. 103–108 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ponte, J.M., Croft, W.B.: A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In: SIGIR, pp. 275–281 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson, S.E.: The probability ranking principle in IR. Journal of Documentation, 294–304 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robertson, S.E., Zaragoza, H.: The probabilistic relevance framework: Bm25 and beyond. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 3(4), 333–389 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information Retrieval. Butterworths (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, J., Zhu, J.: Portfolio theory of information retrieval. In: SIGIR, pp. 115–122 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.D.: A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In: SIGIR, pp. 334–342 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.D.: A risk minimization framework for information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 42(1), 31–55 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu, J., Wang, J., Cox, I.J., Taylor, M.J.: Risky business: modeling and exploiting uncertainty in information retrieval. In: SIGIR, pp. 99–106 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, P., Song, D., Wang, J., Zhao, X., Hou, Y. (2011). On Modeling Rank-Independent Risk in Estimating Probability of Relevance. In: Salem, M.V.M., Shaalan, K., Oroumchian, F., Shakery, A., Khelalfa, H. (eds) Information Retrieval Technology. AIRS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7097. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25631-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25631-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25630-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25631-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics