Skip to main content

Semantic-Based Opinion Retrieval Using Predicate-Argument Structures and Subjective Adjectives

  • Conference paper
  • 1331 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7097))

Abstract

We present the results of our experiment on the use of predicate-argument structures containing subjective adjectives for semantic-based opinion retrieval. The approach exploits the grammatical tree derivation of sentences to show the underlying meanings through the respective predicate-argument structures. The underlying meaning of each subjective sentence is then semantically compared with the underlying meaning of the query topic given in natural language sentence. Rather than using frequency of opinion words or their proximity to query words, our solution is based on frequency of semantically related subjective sentences. We formed a linear relevance model that uses explicit and implicit semantic similarities between predicate-argument structures of subjective sentences and the given query topic. Thus, the technique ensures that opinionated documents retrieved are not only subjective but have semantic relevance to the given query topic. Experimental results show that the technique improves performance of topical opinion retrieval task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zhang, M., Ye, X.: A generation model to unify topic relevance and lexicon-based sentiment for opinion retrieval. In: The 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Singapore (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, S.-W., Lee, J.-T., Song, Y.-I., Rim, H.-C.: High precision opinion retrieval using sentiment-relevance flows. In: The 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Geneva, Switzerland (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stefan Siersdorfer, S.C., Pedro, J.S.: How Useful are Your Comments? Analyzing and Predicting YouTube Comments and Comment Ratings. In: International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), North Carolina, USA, pp. 891–900 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Luís Sarmento, P.C., Silva, M.J., de Oliveira, E.: Automatic creation of a reference corpus for political opinion mining in user-generated content. In: Proc. of the 1st International CIKM Workshop on Topic-Sentiment Analysis for Mass Opinion, Hong Kong, China (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2, 1–135 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ding, X., Liu, B., Yu, P.S.: A holistic lexicon-based approach to opinion mining. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining, California, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hiemstra, D.: Using language models for information retrieval. PhD Thesis, Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, The Netherlands (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Amati, G., Amodeo, G., Bianchi, M., Gaibisso, C., Gambosi, G.: A Uniform Theoretic Approach to Opinion and Information Retrieval. In: Armano, G., de Gemmis, M., Semeraro, G., Vargiu, E. (eds.) Intelligent Information Access. SCI, vol. 301, pp. 83–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson, S., Zaragoza, H.: The Probabilistic Relevance Framework: BM25 and Beyond. Found. and Trends in Information Retrieval 3, 333–389 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shima Gerani, M.J.C., Crestani, F.: Proximity-Based Opinion Retrieval. In: SIGIR ACM, Geneva, Switzerland, p. 978 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Javanmardi, S., Gao, J., Wang, K.: Optimizing two stage bigram language models for IR. In: Proc. of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), North Carolina, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steedman, M.: The Syntactic Process (Language, Speech, and Communication). The MIT Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, S., Curran, J.R.: Wide-coverage efficient statistical parsing with ccg and log-linear models. Comput. Linguist. 33, 493–552 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Curran, J.R., Clark, S., Bos, J.: Linguistically motivated large-scale NLP with C & C and boxer. In: Proc. of the 45th Annual Meeting of the ACL on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions, Prague, Czech Republic (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gildea, D., Hockenmaier, J.: Identifying semantic roles using Combinatory Categorial Grammar. In: Proc. of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, vol. 10 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Deerwester, S., Harshman, R.: Using latent semantic analysis to improve access to textual information. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Washington, D.C., United States (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hofmann, T.: Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In: Proc. of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lavrenko, V., Croft, W.B.: Relevance based language models. In: Proc. of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lv, Y., Zhai, C.: A comparative study of methods for estimating query language models with pseudo feedback. In: Proc. of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), Hong Kong, China (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rijsbergen, C.J.V.: A Theoretical Basis for the use of Co-Occurrence Data in Information Retrieval. Journal of Documentation 33, 106–119 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ounis, I., Macdonald, C., Soboroff, I.: Overview of the TREC 2008 Blog Track. In: TREC 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Torsten, Z., Christof, M., Iryna, G.: Extracting Lexical Semantic Knowledge from Wikipedia and Wiktionary. In: LREC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yeha Lee, S.-H.N., Kim, J., Nam, S.-H., Jung, H.-Y., Lee, J.-H.: KLE at TREC 2008 Blog Track: Blog Post and Feed Retrieval. In: TREC 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hatzivassiloglou, V., McKeown, K.R.: Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In: Proc. of the 8th Conference on European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL, Madrid, Spain, pp. 174–181 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Orimaye, S.O., Alhashmi, S.M., Eu-Gene, S. (2011). Semantic-Based Opinion Retrieval Using Predicate-Argument Structures and Subjective Adjectives. In: Salem, M.V.M., Shaalan, K., Oroumchian, F., Shakery, A., Khelalfa, H. (eds) Information Retrieval Technology. AIRS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7097. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25631-8_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25631-8_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25630-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25631-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics