Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Ubiquitous Display Environments pp 213–228Cite as

Virtual Technologies and Empowerment of Users of Rehabilitation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 779 Accesses

Part of the book series: Cognitive Technologies ((COGTECH))

Abstract

Empowerment is a multi-dimensional social process that helps people gain control over their own lives. Empowerment of people with disabilities entails the motivation to control as well as the knowledge and skills to adapt to and influence one’s own rehabilitation process. The goal of empowered rehabilitation is to guide users to achieve their maximal independence by developing the skills necessary to overcome the physical, social and emotional barriers in their lives. We are currently witnessing a profound change in social attitudes where, after years of repression, people with disabilities struggle for their human rights and for control over resources. Information and communication technologies (ICT) have been used to empower populations who are weak due to gender, poverty, rural residence, age and disability. In this chapter, we have applied a model of patterns of social change to show how the use of novel ICT technologies may contribute to social change and empowerment of people with disabilities. Each of the model’s four patterns – social planning, social reform, social development and social action – is illustrated with an example of the role of technology during this process. Lessons learned during the empowerment process for people with disabilities may also be incorporated into general ICT programs to help enhance usage in additional segments of the population including minority groups as well as those who have traditionally been challenged in this area (e.g. the elderly, people who live in remote locations).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hurst, R., and Albert, B.: 2006. The social model of disability, human rights and development cooperation. In: Albert, B. (ed.), In or Out of the Mainstream? Lessons from Research on Disability and Development Cooperation, pp. 24–39. Leeds, UK: Disability Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Longmore, P. K.: 2003. Why I Burned My. Book and Other Essays on Disability, Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press, 278 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Poetz, C. L.: 2003. Reflections on 30 years of involvement in self-advocacy. J. Intell. Dev. Disabil. 28, 84–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reiter, S.: 2008. Disability from a humanistic perspective: Towards a better quality of life. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Preiser, W. F. E., and Ostroff, E. (eds.): 2001. Universal Design Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sehgal, R., and Stewart, G.: 2006. Using Qualitative Analysis for Deriving Evidence Based Construct Definition: A Case Narrative of ‘User Empowerment. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Qualitative Research in IT & IT in Qualitative Research, 27–29 November 2006, Australia, Queensland, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Page, N., and Czuba, C.E.: 1999. Empowerment, What is it? Journal of Extension, [On-line], 37, (5) 1–7, http://www.joe.org/joe/1999october/comm1.html.

  8. Kreisberg, S.: Transforming power: Domination, empowerment, and education. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rappoport, J.: 1984. Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue. Prev. Hum. Serv. 3, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rogers, E. S., Chamberlin, J., Ellison, M. L., and Crean, T.: 1997. A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatr. Serv. 48, 1042–1047.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenfield, S., Neese-Todd, S.: 1993. Elements of a psychosocial clubhouse program associated with a satisfying quality of life. Hosp. Community Psych. 44, 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wowra, S., McCarter, R.: 1999. Validation of the empowerment scale with an outpatient mental health population. Psychiatr. Serv. 50, 959–961.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Florin, P., Wandersman, A.: 1190. An introduction to citizen participation, voluntary organizations, and community development: insights for empowerment through research. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 18(1), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson, P.: 1996. Empowerment: Community economic development from the inside out. Urban. Stud. 33(4–5), 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmerman, M.A.: 2000. Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In: Rappaport, J. and Seidman, E. (eds.), Handbook of Community Psychology, pp. 43–63. Plenum Press, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Spreitzer, G.M.: 1995. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Acad. Manage. J. 38 (5), 1442–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Doll, W. J., Deng, X., Metts, G. A.: 2003.User Empowerment in Computer mediated Work. Paper presented at the ISOneWorld 2003, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., MaKenna, K.Y.A., and Tal, S.A.: 2008. E-empowerment: Empowerment by the Internet. Comput. Human. Behav. 24 (5), 1776–1789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G3ict: 2007. The Accessibility Imperative. A Division of World Times, Inc, http://www.g3ict.com

  20. Vicente M.R., and López A.J.: 2009. Are people with disabilities losing the ICT Revolution? Some evidence on European countries. The Open Soc. Sci. J. 2, 78–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dobransky, K., Hargittai, E.: 2006. The disability divide in Internet access and use. Inform. Commun. Soc. 9, 313–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Research and Training Center on Disability in Rural Communities Disability and the Digital Divide: 2006. Comparing Surveys with Disability Data, http://rtc.ruralinstitute.umt.edu/TelCom/Divide.htm

  23. Blair, J.: 2006. A computer and internet future: enabling inclusion? Learn. Disabil. Pract. Res. 9(9), 31–37.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. European Commission: 2007. Empirica and Work Research Center. Measuring e-accessibility in Europe. Brussels: European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/einclusion/library/studies/meac_study/index_en.htm

  25. Zimmerman, M.A., Warschausky, S.: 1998. Empowerment Theory for Rehabilitation Research: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. Rehabil. Psychol. 43 (1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Riva, G., and Gaggioli, A.: 2009. Rehabilitation as empowerment: The role of advanced technologies. In: Gaggioli, A., Keshner, E., Weiss, P.L., Riva, G. (eds.) Advanced Technologies in Rehabilitation: Empowering Cognitive, Physical, Social and Communicative Skills through Virtual Reality, Robots, Wearable Systems and Brain-Computer Interfaces. IOS Press: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Charlton, J.I.: 2000. Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment. Berkley, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chamberlin, J.: 1997. A working definition of empowerment. Psychiatr. Rehabil. J. 20(4), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bunning, K., Heath, B., Minnion, A.: 2009. Communication and Empowerment: A Place for Rich and Multiple Media? J. Appl. Res. Intellect. 22 (4), 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lopez-Claros, A., and Zahidi, S.: 2005. Women’s empowerment: measuring the global gender gap,The World Economic Forum website, http://www.weforum.org/pdf/Global_Competitiveness_Reports/Reports/gender_gap.pdf

  31. Valaitis, R.K.: 2005. Computers and the Internet: Tools for youth empowerment. J. Med. Internet. Res. 7(5), e51, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1550685/

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rizzo, A.A., Buckwalter, J.G., Neumann, U.: 1997. Virtual reality and cognitive rehabilitation: a brief review of the future. J. Head. Trauma. Rehabil. 12, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rizzo, A.A., Kim, G.: 2005. A SWOT analysis of the field of Virtual Rehabilitation and Therapy. Presence-Teleop. Virt. 14, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Weiss, P.L., Kizony, K., Feintuch, U. and Katz, N.:2006. Virtual Reality in Neurorehabilitation. In: Selzer, M. E., Cohen, L., Gage, F.H., Clarke, S., & Duncan, P. W. (eds.) the Textbook of Neural Repair and Neurorehabilitation, vol. 2, pp.182–197. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schultheis, M.T., Rizzo, A.A.: 2001. The application of virtual reality technology for rehabilitation. Rehabil. Psychol. 46, 296–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rose, F. D., Brooks, B. M. and Attree, E. A.: 2000. Virtual reality in vocational training of people with learning disabilities. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies (ICDVRAT), Sardinia, pp. 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jack, D., Boian, R., Merians, A., Tremaine, M., Burdea, G.C., Adamovich, S.V., Recce, M., Poizner, H.: 2001.Virtual reality- enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 9, 308–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jeffries, A.: 1996. Modelling community work: an analytic framework for practice. J. Community Pract. 3 (3/4), 101–125.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Churchman, A., and Barak, A.: 2003. Empowerment and partnership– a deceiving terminology In Churchman, A., and Sadan, E. (eds.) Participation: your way to make a difference, pp. 106–124. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publication House Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Weil, M., and Gamble, D.N.: 2005. Evolution, models, and changing context of community practice. In: Weil, M. (ed.) The handbook of community practice. pp.117–150. Sage Publication, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Blomquist, K. B.: 2006. Health, education, work, and independence of young adults with disabilities. Orthop. Nurs. 25(3), 168–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hudson, B.: 2003. From adolescence to young adulthood: The partnership challenge for learning disability services in England. Disabil. Soc. 18(3), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lotan, M., Isakov, E., Kessel, S., Merrick, J.: 2004. Physical fitness and functional ability of children with intellectual disability: effects of a short-term daily treadmill intervention. The Sci. World. J. 4, 449–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pitetti, K. H., Boneh, S.: 1995. Cardiovascular fitness as related to leg strength in adults with mental retardation. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 27(3), 423–428.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Halle, J. W., Gabler-Halle, D., Chung, Y. B.: 1999. Effects of a peer mediated aerobic conditioning program on fitness levels of youth with mental retardation: two systematic replications. Ment. Retard. 37(6), 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fernhall, B., Tymeson, G. T.: 1998. Validation of a cardiovascular fitness field test for adults with mental retardation. Adapt. Phys. Activ. Q. 5, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dattilo, J. Schleien, S.J.: 1994. Understanding leisure services for individuals with mental retardation. Ment Retard. 32, 53–9.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Thomas, A.D., Rosenberg, A.: 2003. Promoting community recreation and leisure. Pediatr. Phys. Ther. 15, 232–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Van Naarden Braun, K., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., and Lollar, D.: 2006. Factors associated with leisure activity among young adults with developmental disabilities. Res. Dev. Disabil. 27, 567–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Frey, G. C., Buchanan, A. M., Rosser Sandt, D. D.: 2005. “I’d Rather Watch TV”: An Examination of Physical Activity in Adults with Mental Retardation. Ment. Retard. 43, 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hayden, M.F., Lakin, K.C., Hill, B.K., Bruininks, R.H.: 1992. Social and leisure integration of people with mental retardation in foster homes and small group homes. Educ. Train. Ment. Retard. 27, 187–99.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Langone, J.: 1996. Mild mental retardation. In: McLaaughlin, P.J., Wehman, P. (eds.) Mental retardation and developmental disabilities. pp. 113–129. Austin, Texas: Pro-ed.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Schleien, S.J., Ray, M.T.: 1998. Community recreation and persons with disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Specht, J., King, G., Brown, E., Foris, C.: 2002. The importance of leisure in the lives of persons with congenital physical disabilities. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 56, 436–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Brett, A.: 1997. Assistive and adaptive technology: Supporting competence and independence in young children with disabilities. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 25, 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bryen, D.N., Slesaransky, G., and Baker, D.B.: 1995. Augmentative communication and empowerment supports. Augment. Altern. Commun. 11, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mirenda, P., Mathy-Laikko, P.: 1989. Augmentative and Alternative Communication applications for persons with severe congenital communication disorders: An introduction. Augment. Altern. Commun. 1, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Fine, A.H. Fine, N.M.: 1996. Therapeutic recreation for exceptional children: Let me in I want to play (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Raz, S.: 1998. Establish a multi-purpose model for the rehabilitation of children with special needs. World Leisure and Recreation, 1, 30–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Suto, M.: 1998. Leisure in occupational therapy. Can. J. Occup. Ther. 65, 271–278.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Standen, P.J., Brown, D.J.: 2005. Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of people with intellectual disabilities: review. CyberPsychol. Behav. 8, 272–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Weiss, P.L., Sveistrup, H., Rand, D. and Kizony, R.: 2009. Video capture virtual reality: A decade of rehabilitation assessment and intervention. Phys. Ther. Rev. 14, 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lotan, M., Yalon-Chamovitz, S., Weiss P.L.: 2009. Improving physical fitness of individuals with intellectual and developmental disability through a Virtual Reality Intervention Program. Res. Dev. Disabil. 30, 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Lotan, M., Yalon-Chamovitz, S. and Weiss, P.L. Virtual Reality as means to improve physical fitness of individuals at a severe level of intellectual and developmental disability. Res. Dev. Disabil. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Ruuskanen, J. M., Parkatti, T.: 1994. Physical activity and related factors among nursing home residents. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 42(9), 987–991.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Temple, V. A.: 2007. Barriers, enjoyment, and preference for physical activity among adults with intellectual disability. Int. J. Rehabil. Res, 30(4), 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Fox, R. A., Rosenberg, R., and Rotatori, A.: 1985. F. Parent involvement in a treatment program for obese retarded adults. Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 16(1), 45–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Chamberlin, J.: 1997. A working definition of empowerment. Psychiatr. Rehabil. J. 20 (4), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Brennan, D., Georgeadis, A., Baron, C.: 2002. Telerehabilitation tools for the provision of remote speech-language treatment. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 8(4), 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Samoocha, D., Bruinvels, D.J., Anema1, J.R., Steenbeek, R., van der Beek, A.K.: 2009. Empowerment of disability benefit claimants through an interactive website: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 9, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Brennan, D.M., Barker, L.M.: 2008. Human factors in the development and implementation of telerehabilitation systems. J. Telemed Telecare. 14, 55–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Jennett, P.A., Affleck Hall, L., Hailey, D., Ohinmaa, A., Anderson, C., Thomas, R., Young, B., Lorenzetti, D. Scott, R.E.: 2003. The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review. J. Telemed. Telecare. 9, 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Coulter, A., and Ellins, J.: 2006. Patient-focused interventions: A review of the evidence. The Health Foundation , London http://www.health.org.uk/publications/patient-focused-interventions/ Retrieved 2011-05-22.

  74. Mountain, G.A., Ware, P.M., Hammerton, J., Mawson, S.J., Zheng, H., Davies, R., Black, N.D., Zhou, H., Hu, H., Harris, N., and Eccleston, C.: 2006. The SMART Project: A user led approach to developing and testing technological applications for domiciliary stroke rehabilitation. In: Clarkson, P., Langdon, J., and Robinson, P. (eds.) Designing Accessible Technology, Springer-Verlag London.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Burgstahler, S., and Cronheim, D.: 2001. Supporting peer-peer and mentor-protege relationships on the internet. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 34(1), 59–74.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Seeger, K.L.: 2007. Mentoring youth with disabilities: The mentor’s lived experiences. Unpublished master’s thesis, The School of Human Resource Education and Workforce Development, Louisiana State University, U.S.A.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Shpigelman, C., Reiter, S. and Weiss P.L.: 2009. A conceptual framework for electronic socio-emotional support for people with special needs. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 32:301–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Andersson, G., Bergström, J., Holländare, F., Carlbring, P., Kaldo, V., and Ekselius, L.: 2005. Internet-based self-help for depression: randomized controlled trial. Br. J. Psychiatry. 187, 456–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Barak, A., and Dolev-Cohen, M.: 2006. Does activity level in online support groups for distressed adolescents determine emotional relief? Couns. Psychotherapy Res. 6(3), 186–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. van Uden-Kraan, C.F., Drossaert, C.H.C., Taal, E., Shaw, B.R., Seydel, E.R., van de Laar, M.A.F.J.: 2008. Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qual. Health Res. 18(3), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Bowker, N.I., and Tuffin, K.: 2007. Understanding positive subjectives made possible online for disabled people. NZ. J. Psychol. 36(2), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Current user metrics for Second Life”. http://secondlife.com/xmlhttp/secondlife.php. Retrieved 2010-02-19

  83. Cooper, T.: 2007. Nutrition Game. Second Life Education Workshop 2007. 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kamel Boulos, M.N., Hetherington, L., Wheeler, S.: 2007. Second Life: An overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Info. Libr. J. 24, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Gorini, A., Gaggioli1, A., Vigna, C., Riva, G.: 2008. A Second Life for eHealth: Prospects for the use of 3-D virtual worlds in clinical psychology. J. Med. Internet Res. 10(3), e21.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Lester, J.: All about Live2Give. Live2Give: An innovative Online Community for people dealing with Cerebral Palsy and similar conditions. Braintalk Blog. http://braintalk.blogs.com/live2give/2005/01/all_about_live2.html

  87. eLeaders for Youth and ICT (2009). A digital shift: Youth and ICT for development. Global for ICT development. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Global Alliance for ICT and Development, New York. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/gaid/unpan036084.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel

    Naomi Schreuer (Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences) & Patrice L. Tamar Weiss (Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences)

Authors
  1. Naomi Schreuer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrice L. Tamar Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naomi Schreuer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. German Research Center for Artificial In, Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, Saarbrücken, 66123, Germany

    Antonio Krüger

  2. Mount Carmel, Haifa, 31905, Israel

    Tsvi Kuflik

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schreuer, N., Weiss, P.L.T. (2012). Virtual Technologies and Empowerment of Users of Rehabilitation. In: Krüger, A., Kuflik, T. (eds) Ubiquitous Display Environments. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27663-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27663-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27662-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27663-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation