Skip to main content

A Faster Algorithm for Dominating Set Analyzed by the Potential Method

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7112))

Abstract

Measure and Conquer is a recently developed technique to analyze worst-case complexity of backtracking algorithms. The traditional measure and conquer analysis concentrates on one branching at once by using only small number of variables. In this paper, we extend the measure and conquer analysis and introduce a new analyzing technique named “potential method” to deal with consecutive branchings together. In potential method, the optimization problem becomes sparse; therefore, we can use large number of variables. We applied this technique to the minimum dominating set problem and obtained the current fastest algorithm that runs in O(1.4864n) time and polynomial space. We also combined this algorithm with a precalculation by dynamic programming and obtained O(1.4689n) time and space algorithm. These results show the power of the potential method and possibilities of future applications to other problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eppstein, D.: Quasiconvex analysis of multivariate recurrence equations for backtracking algorithms. ACM Transactions on Algorithms 2(4), 492–509 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Fomin, F.V., Grandoni, F., Kratsch, D.: Measure and Conquer: Domination – A Case Study. In: Caires, L., Italiano, G.F., Monteiro, L., Palamidessi, C., Yung, M. (eds.) ICALP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3580, pp. 191–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Fomin, F.V., Kratsch, D.: Exact Exponential Algorithms. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Fomin, F.V., Kratsch, D., Woeginger, G.J.: Exact (Exponential) Algorithms for the Dominating Set Problem. In: Hromkovič, J., Nagl, M., Westfechtel, B. (eds.) WG 2004. LNCS, vol. 3353, pp. 245–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaspers, S., Sorkin, G.: A universally fastest algorithm for max 2-sat, max 2-csp, and everything in between. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 606–615. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grandoni, F.: Exact algorithms for hard graph problems. Ph.D. thesis, Universitá di Roma “Tor Vergata” (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Randerath, B., Schiermeyer, I.: Exact algorithms for MINIMUM DOMINATING SET. Tech. rep., zaik-469, Zentrum für Angewandte Informatik Köln, Germany (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robson, J.: Algorithms for maximum independent sets. Journal of Algorithms 7(3), 425–440 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. van Rooij, J.M.M.: Design by measure and conquer: an O(1.5086n) algorithm for minimum dominating set and similar problems. Master’s thesis, Utrecht University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Rooij, J.M.M., Bodlaender, H.L.: Design by measure and conquer: a faster exact algorithm for dominating set. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2008), pp. 657–668 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van Rooij, J.M.M., Bodlaender, H.L.: Design by measure and conquer: exact algorithms for dominating set. Tech. rep., UU-CS-2009-025, Utrecht University, The Netherlands (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Rooij, J.M.M., Nederlof, J., van Dijk, T.C.: Inclusion/Exclusion Meets Measure and Conquer. In: Fiat, A., Sanders, P. (eds.) ESA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5757, pp. 554–565. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Wahlstrom, M.: Exact algorithms for finding minimum transversals in rank-3 hypergraphs. Journal of Algorithms 51(2), 107–121 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Iwata, Y. (2012). A Faster Algorithm for Dominating Set Analyzed by the Potential Method. In: Marx, D., Rossmanith, P. (eds) Parameterized and Exact Computation. IPEC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7112. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28050-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28050-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28049-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28050-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics