Abstract
When multiple similar business processes must be designed, a trade-off is necessary between designing a single, standardized, process or designing multiple, specific, processes. Standardization, on the one hand, helps to benefit from re-use of resources and to reduce redundancy. Specificity, on the other hand, helps to tailor the processes to specific needs. The activity of deciding on this trade-off is called harmonization. This paper operationalizes the notion of process harmonization, identifies aspects that determine harmonization and defines metrics to determine the level of harmonization. Furthermore, it presents the factors that influence the level of harmonization that can be achieved in a company. The harmonization aspects and factors are extracted from case studies in practice. Together the metrics, aspects and factors can be used to determine the current and optimal level of harmonization for a company.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Muenstermann, B., Eckhardt, A., Weitzel, T.: The performance impact of business process standardization. Business Process Management Journal 6, 29–56 (2010)
Davenport, T.: The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Business Review 83, 100–108 (2005)
Wöllenweber, K., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T., König, W.: The impact of process standardization on business process outsourcing success. Information Systems Frontiers 10, 221–224 (2008)
Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W., Jansen-Vuller, M., La Rosa, M.: Configurable Process Models: Experiences from a Municipality Case Study. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 486–500. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Richen, A., Steinhorst, A.: Standardization or harmonization? you need both. In: European Health Informatics (November 2005)
Tay, J., Parker, R.: Measuring international harmonization and standardization. Abacus 28, 217–220 (1992)
Welch, J., Kordysh, D.: Seven keys to erp success. Strategic Finance 89, 40–47 (2007)
Darshana, S., Dey, S.: Everyone is different! exploring the issues and problems with ERP enabled shared service initiatives. In: Proc. of ACIS 2007, pp. 93–98 (2007)
Norta, A., Eshuis, R.: Specification and verification of harmonized business process collaborations. Information Systems Frontiers 12, 457–479 (2009)
Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W., Jansen-Vuller, M., La Rosa, M.: Configurable workflow models. IJCIS 17, 177–221 (2008)
Gulla, J., Mollan, R.: Implementing SAP R/3 in a multi-cultural organization. In: Proc. of EMRPS 1999, pp. 127–134 (1999)
Tumay, K.: Business process simulation. In: Proc. of Conf. on Winter Simulation, pp. 93–98. IEEE Computer Society (1996)
Schafermeyer, M., Grgecic, D., Rosenkranz, C.: Factor influencing business process standardization. In: Proc. of HICSS 2010, pp. 3–10. IEEE Computer Society (2010)
Dijkman, R.: Diagnosing Differences Between Business Process Models. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 261–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Romero, H., Dijkman, R., Grefen, P., van Weele, A. (2012). Harmonization of Business Process Models. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 99. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28107-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28108-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)