Skip to main content

Separating Compliance Management and Business Process Management

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 100))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The ever growing set of regulations and laws organizations have to comply to, introduces many new challenges. Current approaches that check for compliance by implementing controls in an existing information system (IS) decrease the maintainability of both the set of compliance rules and the IS. In this position paper, we advocate the separation of the compliance process from the organization’s business processes. We introduce a life cycle for the management of compliance rules. A separate compliance engine is used to define and check compliance rules independent from the existing IS within an organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A Methodological Framework for Aligning Business Processes and Regulatory Compliance

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., de Beer, H.T., van Dongen, B.F.: Process Mining and Verification of Properties: An Approach Based on Temporal Logic. In: Meersman, R. (ed.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3760, pp. 130–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Hee, K.M., van der Werf, J.M.E.M., Kumar, A., Verdonk, M.: Conceptual Model for Online Auditing. Decision Support Systems 50(3), 636–647 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adriansyah, A., Sidorova, N., van Dongen, B.F.: Cost-based Fitness in Conformance Checking. In: ACSD 2011. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. El Kharbili, M., de Medeiros, A.K.A., Stein, S., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business Process Compliance Checking: Current State and Future Challenges. In: Modellierung betrieblicher Informationssysteme (MobIS). LNI, pp. 107–113 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fötsch, D., Pulvermüller, E., Rossak, W.: Modeling and Verifying Workflow-based Regulations. In: Regulations Modelling and their Validation/ Verification, pp. 825–830 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghose, A., Koliadis, G.: Auditing Business Process Compliance. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Giblin, C., Liu, A.Y., Müller, S., Pfitzmann, B., Zhou, X.: Regulations Expressed As Logical Models (REALM). JURIX, 37–48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kharbili, M., Stein, S., Markovic, I., Pulvermüller, E.: Towards a Framework for Semantic Business Process Compliance Management. In: GRCIS. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 339, pp. 1–15 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lu, R., Sadiq, S., Governatori, G.: Compliance Aware Business Process Design. In: ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Benatallah, B., Paik, H.-Y. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4928, pp. 120–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Westergaard, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Monitoring Business Constraints with Linear Temporal Logic: An Approach Based on Colored Automata. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 132–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Menzies, C.: Sarbanes-Oxley und Corporate Compliance: Nachhaltigkeit, Optimierung, Integration. Schäffer Poeschel, Stuttgart (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Waidner, M., Pfitzmann, B., Powers, C.: IBM’s Unified Governance Framework (UGF). Technical report, IBM Research Division, Zurich, IBM Research Report RZ 3699 (99709) (December 10, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rozinat, A., Wynn, M.T., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Fridge, C.J.: Workflow Simulation for Operational Decision Support. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68, 834–850 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sadiq, S., Governatori, G., Namiri, K.: Modeling Control Objectives for Business Process Compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ramezani, E., Fahland, D., van der Werf, J.M., Mattheis, P. (2012). Separating Compliance Management and Business Process Management. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 100. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28115-0_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28115-0_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28114-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28115-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics