Skip to main content

Industry Operations Architecture for Business Process Model Collections

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2011)

Abstract

The absence of a holistic industry-centric architecture for processes is an important BPM shortfall that impacts model collections. This paper introduces a Componentized Industry Business Architecture as a vehicle to address this gap and to make processes better integrated with other critical dimensions in organizational design. This architecture provides the foundation for a taxonomy of processes and enables process models to be created or potentially rationalized against a comprehensive framework.

Process theory and industrial organization show that processes have different structure and dynamics. However, most processes used in workflows and case management have a similar ‘factory’ nature, i.e., production processes in the enterprise. The Componentized Industry Business Architecture shows that not all processes that matter follow this type of behavior. Oversight Processes constitute an important example and will be studied in depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 30–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Reijers, H.A., Mans, R.S., van der Toorn, R.A.: Improved Model Management with Aggregated Business Process Models. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68(2), 221–243 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J.: Configurable Multi-Perspective Business Process Models. Information Systems 36(2), 313–340 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sanz, J.L.C.: Entity-Centric Operations Modeling for Business Process Management. Part 1: An Interdisciplinary Review of the State-of-the-Art. IBM Technical Report (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Van de Ven, A., Poole, M.: Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 20(3), 510–540 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Cardoso, J.: What Makes Process Models Understandable? In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Seven Process Modeling Guidelines. Information and Software Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L.: Graph Matching Algorithms for Business Process Model Similarity Search. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Dumas, M., Garcıa-Banuelos, L., Dijkman, R.: Similarity Search of Business Process Models. Technical Report

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Dongen, B.F., Dijkman, R.M., Mendling, J.: Measuring Similarity between Business Process Models. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 450–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Yan, Z., Dijkman, R., Grefen, P.: Fast Business Process Similarity Search with Feature-Based Similarity Estimation. Eindhoven University of Technology (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24, 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leung, Y., Bockstedt, J.: Structural Analysis of a Business Enterprise. Service Science 3(1), 169–188 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Green, P.: Business Process Modeling: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10(4), 333–363 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ko, R., Lee, S., Lee, E.: Business Process Management (BPM) Standards: A Survey. Business Process Management Journal 15(5), 744–791 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Kavakli, V., Loucopoulos, P.: Goal-driven Business Process Analysis Application in Electricity Deregulation. Information Systems 24(3), 187–207 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharp, A., McDermott, P.: Workflow Modeling: Tools for Process Improvements and Application Development, 1st edn. Artech House (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ould, M.: Business Processes – Modelling and Analysis for Re-engineering and Improvement. Wiley (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harrison-Broninski, K.: Human Interactions - The Heart and Soul of Business Process Management. Meghan-Kiffer Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van der Aalst, W., Hofstede, A., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow Patterns. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Data Bases 14, 5–51 (2003a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003b)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. De Man, H.: Case Management: A Review of Modeling Approaches. BPTrends (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van der Aalst, W.: Formalization and Verification of Event-Driven Process Chains. In: Backhouse, R., Baetenm, J.C. (eds.) Computing Science Report 98/01. University of Technology, Eindhoven (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simon, H., Ando, A.: Aggregation of Variables in Dynamic Systems. Econometrica 29(2) (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  26. CBM. Component Business Modeling: Making Specialization Real. Institute for Business Value, IBM Corporation (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harishankar, R., Holley, K., High, R., Sanz, J., Giesen, E., Daley, K., Ibrahim, M., Vaidya, S., Antoun, S., Botros, A., Hamid, T.: Actionable Business Architecture: IBM’s Approach. IBM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heene, A., Martens, R., Sanchez, R. (eds.): Competence Perspectives on Learning and Dynamic Capabilities. Elsevier (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Barney, J.: Integrating Organizational Behavior and Strategy Formulation Research: A Resource-based Analysis. In: Shrivastava, P., Huff, A., Dutton, J. (eds.) Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 8, pp. 39–62 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., Winter, S.: Dynamic Capabilities. Blackwell (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Teece, D.: Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chandler, A.: Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Harvard Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Brumagim, A.: A Hierarchy of Corporate Resources. In: Shrivastava, P., Huff, A., Dutton, J. (eds.) Advances in Strategic Management, Part A, Resource-based View of the Firm, vol. 10. JAI Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ould, M.: Business Processes: Modelling and Analysis for Re-Engneering and Improvement. Wiley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Snowdon, B., Kawalek, P.: Active meta-process models: a conceptual exposition. Information and Software Technology 45(15,1), 1021–1029 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Weber, B., Reichert, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Refactoring large process model repositories. Computers in Industry 62(5), 467–486 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sanz, J.L.C. et al. (2012). Industry Operations Architecture for Business Process Model Collections. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 100. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28115-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28115-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28114-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28115-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics