Abstract
Present day enterprises often become service-oriented enterprises, which are comprised of a dynamic network of organisations that collectively provide services. These services express stakeholders’ needs, and can be viewed from different perspectives. In this paper, we consider value web and enterprise architecture perspectives. Specifically, we present a step-wise mapping approach that integrates the value modelling technique e3value into the enterprise architecture language ArchiMate. The main contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we present our initial arrays into how to bridge between e 3 value and ArchiMate and, in doing so, we show how these modelling techniques complement one another. Second, by reflecting on the bridging between e 3 value and ArchiMate, we discuss the limitations of our integration, which provides useful input for future efforts into model integration. We illustrate our approach by means of a case in the insurance domain.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Tapscott, D., Ticoll, D., Lowy, A.: Digital Capital: Harnessing the Power of Business Webs. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2000)
Lankhorst, M., et al.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2005)
Op ’t Land, M., Proper, H., Waage, M., Cloo, J., Steghuis, C.: Enterprise Architecture – Creating Value by Informed Governance. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Jonkers, H., Proper, H., Turner, M.: TOGAF and ArchiMate: A Future Together. The Open Group, White Paper W192 (November 2009), http://www.opengroup.org/bookstore/catalog/w192.htm
van Buuren, R., Gordijn, J., Janssen, W.: Business case modelling for e-services. In: 18th Bled eConference eIntegration in Action (2005)
Nuseibeh, B., Kramer, J., Finkelstein, A.: A framework for expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20(10), 760–773 (1994)
Cummins, J.D., Doherty, N.A.: The economics of insurance intermediaries. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 73(3), 359–396 (2006)
Lankhorst, M., et al.: ArchiMate Language Primer. Telematica institute (2004)
Lankhorst, M.: Viewpoints Functionality and Examples. Telematica Institute (2004)
Bernus, P., Nemes, L., Schmidt, G. (eds.): Handbook on Enterprise Architecture. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin (2003)
Lankhorst, M.M., Proper, H.A., Jonkers, H.: The Architecture of the ArchiMate Language. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 367–380. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Gordijn, J., De Leenheer, P., Razo-Zapata, I.: Generating service valuewebs by hierarchical configuration: An ipr case. In: Proceedings of HICSS 44 (2011)
Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Value based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-commerce ideas. Requirements Engineering Journal 8(2), 114–134 (2003)
Pijpers, V., Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: e3alignment: Exploring inter-organizational alignment in networked value constellations. International Journal of Computer Science & Applications, 59 (2009)
Derzsi, Z., Gordijn, J., Kok, K.: Multi-perspective assessment of scalability of it-enabled networked constellations. In: Sprague, R.H. (ed.) Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 492. IEEE CS (2008)
O.M. Group, Uml 2.0 superstructure specification (2004), http://www.omg.org/cgibin/doc?ptc/2004-10-02
Russell, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Wohed, P.: On the suitability of uml 2.0 activity diagrams for business process modelling. In: APCCM 2006: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling, pp. 95–104. Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst (2006)
Ko, R.K.L., Lee, S.S.G., Lee, E.W.: Business process management (bpm) standards: A survey. Business Process Management Journal 15(5) (2009); Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2009) (accepted on December 2, 2008)
Devedzić, V.: Understanding ontological engineering. Commun. ACM 45, 136–144 (2002), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/505248.506002
Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: QOM – Quick Ontology Mapping. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 683–697. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Noy, N., Musen, M.: The prompt suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(6), 983–1024 (2003)
Happel, H., Seedorf, S.: Applications of ontologies in software engineering. In: 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering (SWESE 2006), held at the 5th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2006 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
de Kinderen, S., Gaaloul, K., Proper, H.A.E. (2012). Integrating Value Modelling into ArchiMate. In: Snene, M. (eds) Exploring Services Science. IESS 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 103. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28227-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28227-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28226-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28227-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)