Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications

DASFAA 2012: Database Systems for Advanced Applications pp 287–294Cite as

Acarp: Author-Centric Analysis of Research Papers

  • Conference paper

  • 1756 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7239))

Abstract

Scientific publications are an important kind of user-generated content, which contains not only high-quality content but also structures, e.g. citations. Scientific publication analysis has attracted much attention in both database and data mining research community.

In this demonstration, we present a system, named as Acarp, for analyzing research papers in database community. The relationship between a research paper and the authors is analyzed based on a learning to rank model. Not only the content of the paper, but also the citation graph is used in the analysis. Acarp can not only guess authors for papers under double-blind reviewing, but also analyze the researchers’ continuity and diversity of research. This author-centric analysis could be interesting to researchers and be useful for further studying on double-blind reviewing process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Qian, W., Zhang, W., Zhou, A.: Are Reviewers Really Blind in Double Blind Review, Or They Just Pretend to Be? East China Normal University, Technical Report (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Herbrich, R., Graepel, T., Obermayer, K.: Large Margin Rank Boundaries for Ordinal Regression. In: Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pp. 115–132. MIT Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ley, M.: Subharmonic solutions with prescribed minimal period for nonautonomous Hamiltonian systems (2011), http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/~ley/db/

  4. The College of Information Sciences and Technology at Penn State: Scientific Literature Digital Library and Search Engine (2011), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/

  5. Google Inc.: Google Scholar (2011), http://scholar.google.com

  6. KEG at Tsinghua University: Academic Researcher Social Network Search (2011), http://arnetminer.org/

  7. Wang, Y., Geng, Z., Huang, S., Wang, X., Zhou, A.: Academic web search engine: generating a survey automatically. In: WWW, pp. 1161–1162 (2007), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1242572.1242745

  8. Tung, A.K.H.: Impact of double blind reviewing on SIGMOD publication: a more detail analysis. SIGMOD Record 35(3), 6–7 (2006), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1168092.1168093

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Massive Computing, Software Engineering Institute, East China Normal University, China

    Weiming Zhang, Xueqing Gong, Weining Qian & Aoying Zhou

Authors
  1. Weiming Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xueqing Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Weining Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aoying Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, 151747, Seoul, South Korea

    Sang-goo Lee

  2. Computer School, Wuhan University, Luo-jia-shan, Wuchang, 430081, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China

    Zhiyong Peng

  3. School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Xiaofang Zhou

  4. Department of Computer Science, Kangwon National University, 192-1, Hyoja2-Dong, 200701, Chuncheon, Kangwon, South Korea

    Yang-Sae Moon

  5. Institute for Computer Science and Business Information, University of Duisburg-Essen, Schützenbahn 70, 45117, Essen, Germany

    Rainer Unland

  6. School of Information and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, 52 Naesudong-ro, Heungdeok-gu, 4072, Cheongju, Chungbuk, South Korea

    Jaesoo Yoo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, W., Gong, X., Qian, W., Zhou, A. (2012). Acarp: Author-Centric Analysis of Research Papers. In: Lee, Sg., Peng, Z., Zhou, X., Moon, YS., Unland, R., Yoo, J. (eds) Database Systems for Advanced Applications. DASFAA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7239. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29035-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29035-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29034-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29035-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation