Abstract
The availability of diverse information does not guarantee that a person’s views will be equally diverse. Research has consistently shown that attitudinal positions on an issue will lead to selective reception and dissemination of information, which in turn have reciprocal effects on those attitudes. The current paper aims at understanding how the diffusion of information and attitudes in networks are dynamically related to each other from a computational perspective. Simulations from an agent-based model show that selective exposure of information and social reinforcement in active dissemination of information can lead to polarization of attitudes in the network. Network structures are shown to have significant effects on information and attitude diffusion. While simple contagion models of information diffusion predicts that hub nodes in a small-world network can facilitate propagation of information, our model shows that hub nodes can induce stronger polarization of attitudes when information and attitude diffusion can mutually influence each other. Results highlight the importance of incorporating social science research in network models to better establish the micro-to-macro links.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albarracín, D., Johnson, B.T., Zanna, M.P.: The handbook of attitudes. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2005)
Centola, D., Macy, M.: Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology 113(3), 702–734 (2007)
Fu, W.T., Liao, Q.V.: Quality control of online information: A quality-based cascade model. In: International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction (2011)
Granovetter, M.: Threshold models of collective behavior. The American Journal of Sociology 83(6), 1420–1443 (1978)
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M., Merrill, L.: Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin 135(4), 555–588 (2009)
Huberman, B.A., Romero, D.M., Wu, F.: Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. Journal of Information Science 35(6), 758–765 (2009)
Huberman, B.A., Romero, D.M., Wu, F.: Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday 14(1) (2009)
Nowak, A., Szamrej, J., Latan, B.: From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. Psychological Review 97, 362–376 (1990)
Sunstein, C.R.: The law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2), 175–195 (2002)
Visser, P.S., Mirabile, R.R.: Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(6), 779–795 (2004)
Watts, D., Strogatz, S.: Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)
Watts, D.J.: A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(9), 5766–5771 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fu, WT., Liao, Q.V. (2012). Information and Attitude Diffusion in Networks. In: Yang, S.J., Greenberg, A.M., Endsley, M. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral - Cultural Modeling and Prediction. SBP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7227. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29047-3_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29047-3_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29046-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29047-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)