Skip to main content

Towards Design Engineering of Ubiquitous Information Systems

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7286))

Abstract

Designing complex information systems is a task performed by design teams with team members coming from different domains with different expertise. Shared understanding between members of a design team throughout a project is still a challenge. A design framework is presented that integrates individual design knowledge, explicit design knowledge used by design teams, and computational design knowledge. For each type of design knowledge, several modeling languages for expressing conceptual models are known. Translation processes between these characteristic design knowledge explications are introduced. Core elements of this design framework, i.e., modeling languages and translations, are discussed by a Ubiquitous Information System (UIS) development project that was conducted over the period of several years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Doomed from the Start? Why a Majority of Business and IT Teams Anticipate Their Software Development Projects Will Fail, in Geneca Research Report, Geneca LLC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schmidt, R., et al.: Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of Management Information Systems 17(4), 5–36 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Information systems and conceptual modeling - a research agenda. Information Systems Research 13(4), 363–376 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Larsen, T.J., et al.: The role of modelling in achieving information systems success: UML to the rescue? Information Systems Journal 19(1), 83–117 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoo, Y.: Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing. Mis Quarterly 34(2), 213–231 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kogut, B., Zander, U.: What Firms Do? Co-ordination, Identity, and Learning. Organization Science 7, 502–518 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patnayakuni, R., Ruppel, C.P., Rai, A.: Managing the complementarity of knowledge integration and process formalization for systems development performance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7(8), 545–567 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D.: Product Design and Development, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Larsen, T.J., Naumann, J.D.: An Experimental Comparison of Abstract and Concrete Representations in Systems-Analysis. Information & Management 22(1), 29–40 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Booch, G., Rambaugh, J., et al.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addision-Wesley, Redwood City (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wand, Y., et al.: Theoretical foundations for conceptual modelling in information systems development. Decision Support Systems 15, 285–304 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kosslyn, S.M.: Image and Mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pylyshyn, Z.W.: Computation and Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Polanyi, M.: The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, Garden (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fowler, M., Scott, K.: UML Distilled: Applying the Standard Object Modelling Language / UML konzentriert: Strkuturierte Einführung in die Standard-Objektmodellierungssprache, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chown, E., Kaplan, S., Kortenkamp, D.: Prototypes, Location, and Associative Networks (PLAN): Towards a Unified Theory of Cognitive Mapping. Cognitive Science 19(1), 1–51 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simons, A., Graham, I.: 30 Things that Go Wrong in Object Modeliling with UML 1.3. In: Kilov, H., Rumpe, B., Simmonds, I. (eds.) Behavioral Specifications of Businesses and Systems, pp. 237–257. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maass, W., Storey, V.C., Kowatsch, T.: Effects of External Conceptual Models and Verbal Explanations on Shared Understanding in Small Groups. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 92–103. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Bera, P., Krasnoperova, A., Wand, Y.: Using Ontology Languages for Conceptual Modeling. Journal of Database Management 21(1), 1–28 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brachman, R., Levesque, H.: Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jackson, M.A.: Principles of Program Design. Academic Press (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scheer, A.W.: ARIS Business Process Modeling. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process. Addison Wesley Longman (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Verner, J., Evanco, W.M.: In-house software development: what software project management practices lead to success? IEEE Software 22(1), 86–93

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robles Luna, E., Rossi, G., Garrigós, I.: WebSpec: a visual language for specifying interaction and navigation requirements in web applications. Requirements Engineering 16(4), 297–321 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fuxman, A., et al.: Specifying and analyzing early requirements in Tropos. Requirements Engineering 9(2), 132–150 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Siegemund, K., et al.: Towards Ontology-driven Requirements Engineering. In: Workshop Semantic Web Enabled Software Engineering at 10th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Bonn (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maass, W., Janzen, S.: Pattern-Based Approach for Designing with Diagrammatic and Propositional Conceptual Models. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds.) DESRIST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6629, pp. 192–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Jackendoff, R.: Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Alexander, C.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dey, A., Abowd, G.: Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness, in GVU Technical Report, College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bechhofer, S., et al.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. In: Dean, M., Schreiber, G. (eds.) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Maass, W., Janzen, S. (2012). Towards Design Engineering of Ubiquitous Information Systems. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds) Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice. DESRIST 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7286. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29862-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29863-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics