Skip to main content

Learning Sentiments from Tweets with Personal Health Information

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7310))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present results of sentiment analysis in Twitter messages that disclose personal health information. In these messages (tweets), users discuss ailment, treatment, medications, etc. We use the author-centric annotation model to label tweets as positive sentiments, negative sentiments or neutral. The results of the agreement among three raters are reported and discussed. We then use Machine Learning methods on multi-class and binary classification of sentiments. The obtained results are comparable with previous results in the subjectivity analysis of user-written Web content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allan, K.: Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balahur, A., Steinberger, R.: Rethinking Sentiment Analysis in the News: from Theory to Practice and back. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Opionion Mining and Sentiment Analysis (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, W.: Dimensions of Subjectivity in Natural Language (Short Paper). In: Proceedings of ACL-HLT (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chew, C., Eysenbach, G.: Pandemics in the Age of Twitter: Content Analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 Outbreak. PLoS One 5(11) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dodds, P., Harris, K., Kloumann, I., Bliss, C., Danforth, C.: Temporal Patterns of Happiness and Information in a Global Social Network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. PLoS ONE 6, e26752 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Green, A.: Kappa statistics for multiple raters using categorical classifications. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of SAS Users Group (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., Chowdury, A.: Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(11), 2169–2188 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lampos, V., Christianini, N.: Tracking the flu pandemic by monitoring the social web. In: 2nd Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nichols, T., Wisner, P., Cripe, G., Gulabchand, L.: Putting the Kappa Statistic to Use. Qual. Assur. Journal 13, 57–61 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., Routledge, B., Smith, N.: From Tweets to Polls: Linking Text Sentiment to Public Opinion Time Series. In: Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2010), pp. 122–129 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Osman, D., Yearwood, J., Vamplew, P.: Automated opinion detection: Implications of the level of agreement between human raters. Information Processing and Management 46, 331–342 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pennebaker, J., Chung, C.: Expressive Writing, Emotional Upheavals, and Health. In: Friedman, H., Silver, R. (eds.) Handbook of Health Psychology. Oxford University Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sokolova, M., Lapalme, G.: Learning opinions in user-generated Web content. Journal of Natural Language Engineering (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sokolova, M., Schramm, D.: Building a patient-based ontology for mining user-written content. In: Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pp. 758–763 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sokolova, M., Bobicev, V.: Sentiments and Opinions in Health-related Web messages. In: Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, pp. 132–139 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strapparava, C., Mihalcea, R.: Learning to Identify Emotions in Text. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(2), 406–418 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thelwall, M., Wilkinson, D., Uppal, S.: Data Mining Emotion in Social Network Communication: Gender Differences in MySpace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(1), 190–199 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Witten, I., Frank, E., Hall, M.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufman (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bobicev, V., Sokolova, M., Jafer, Y., Schramm, D. (2012). Learning Sentiments from Tweets with Personal Health Information. In: Kosseim, L., Inkpen, D. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7310. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30353-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30353-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30352-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30353-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics