Skip to main content

Epistemic Profiles and Belief Structures

  • Conference paper
Agent and Multi-Agent Systems. Technologies and Applications (KES-AMSTA 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7327))

Abstract

The paper is devoted to a novel formalization of beliefs in multiagent systems. Our aim is to bridge the gap between idealized logical approaches to modeling beliefs and their actual implementations. Therefore the stages of belief acquisition, intermediate reasoning and final belief formation are isolated and analyzed. We give a novel semantics reflecting those stages and suitable for building complex belief structures in the context of incomplete and/or inconsistent information. Namely, an agent starts with constituents, i.e., sets of initial beliefs acquired by perception, expert supplied knowledge, communication with other agents and perhaps other ways. Next, the constituents are transformed into consequents according to agents’ epistemic profiles.

Additionally, a uniform treatment of single agent and group beliefs is achieved. Importantly, we indicate an implementation framework ensuring tractability of reasoning about beliefs.

Supported by the Polish National Science Centre grants 2011/01/B/ST6/02769 and 6505/B/T02/2011/40.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ågotnes, T., Alechina, N.: Full and relative awareness: A decidable logic for reasoning about knowledge of unawareness. In: Proc. of TARK, pp. 6–14. ACM Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belnap, N.: A useful four-valued logic. In: Eptein, G., Dunn, J. (eds.) Modern Uses of Many Valued Logic, pp. 8–37. Reidel (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Béziau, J.-Y., Carnielli, W., Gabbay, D. (eds.): Handbook of Paraconsistency. College Publications (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Amo, S., Pais, M.: A paraconsistent logic approach for querying inconsistent databases. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 46, 366–386 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubois, D.: On ignorance and contradiction considered as truth-values. Logic Journal of the IGPL 16(2), 195–216 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Szałas, A.: Implementing belief structures and epistemic profiles: A case study (submitted 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Teamwork in Multi-Agent Systems. A Formal Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Awareness as a vital ingredient of teamwork. In: Stone, P., Weiss, G. (eds.) Proc. of AAMAS 2006, pp. 1017–1024 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.: Belief, awareness, and limited reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 34(1), 39–76 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Fagin, R., Halpern, J., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.: Reasoning About Knowledge. The MIT Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gottlob, G.: Complexity results for nonmonotonic logics. Journal of Logic and Computation 2(3), 397–425 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Hintikka, J.: Knowledge and Belief. Cornell University Press (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kraus, S., Lehmann, D.: Knowledge, belief, and time. Theoretical Computer Science 58, 155–174 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Laux, A., Wansing, H. (eds.): Knowledge and Belief in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence. Akademie Verlag, Berlin (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Łukaszewicz, W.: Non-Monotonic Reasoning - Formalization of Commonsense Reasoning. Ellis Horwood (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Małuszyński, J., Szałas, A.: Living with Inconsistency and Taming Nonmonotonicity. In: de Moor, O., Gottlob, G., Furche, T., Sellers, A. (eds.) Datalog 2010. LNCS, vol. 6702, pp. 384–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Małuszyński, J., Szałas, A.: Logical foundations and complexity of 4QL, a query language with unrestricted negation. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 21(2), 211–232 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Marek, V., Truszczyński, M.: Nonmonotonic Logic. Springer (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vitória, A., Małuszyński, J., Szałas, A.: Modeling and reasoning with paraconsistent rough sets. Fundamenta Informaticae 97(4), 405–438 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dunin-Kęplicz, B., Szałas, A. (2012). Epistemic Profiles and Belief Structures. In: Jezic, G., Kusek, M., Nguyen, NT., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems. Technologies and Applications. KES-AMSTA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7327. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30947-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30947-2_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30946-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30947-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics