Skip to main content

Exploring Quality of Constraints for Assessment in Problem Solving Environments

  • Conference paper
Book cover Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7315))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One of the approaches that has demonstrated by far its efficiency as a tutorial strategy in problem solving learning environments is the Constraint-Based Modeling (CBM). In existing works it has been combined with a data-driven technique for automatic assessment, the Item Response Theory (IRT). The result is a well-founded model for assessing students while solving problems. In this paper a novel technique for studying quality of constraints for this type of assessment is presented. It has been tested with two new systems, an independent component for assessment that implements CBM with IRT, which provides assessment to a new problem solving environment developed to assess the students’ skills in decision-making in project investments. The results of testing our approach and the application of these two systems with undergraduate students are also discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mitrovic, A., Martin, B., Suraweera, P.: Intelligent Tutors for All: The Constraint-Based Approach. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22, 38–45 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitrovic, A., Koedinger, K.R., Martin, B.: A comparative analysis of cognitive tutoring and constraint-based modeling. In: User Modeling, pp. 313–322 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mitrović, A., Suraweera, P., Martin, B., Zakharov, K., Milik, N., Holland, J.: Authoring Constraint-Based Tutors in ASPIRE. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 41–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gálvez, J., Guzmán, E., Conejo, R., Millán, E.: Student Knowledge Diagnosis Using Item Response Theory and Constraint-Based Modeling. In: The 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 200, pp. 291–298 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gálvez, J., Guzmán, E., Conejo, R.: Data-Driven Student Knowledge Assessment through Ill-Defined Procedural Tasks. In: Meseguer, P., Mandow, L., Gasca, R.M. (eds.) CAEPIA 2009. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 5988, pp. 233–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohlsson, S.: Constraint-based student modeling. In: Student Modeling: the Key to Individualized Knowledge-based Instruction, pp. 167–189 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thurstone, L.L.: A method of scaling psychological and educational tests. Journal of Educational Psychology 16, 433–451 (1925)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin, B., Mitrović, A.: Using Learning Curves to Mine Student Models. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrović, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3538, pp. 79–88. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, B., Mitrović, A.: The Effect of Adapting Feedback Generality in ITS. In: Wade, V.P., Ashman, H., Smyth, B. (eds.) AH 2006. LNCS, vol. 4018, pp. 192–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Birnbaum, A.: Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In: Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., Rogers, H.J.: Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guzmán, E., Conejo, R., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J.L.: Improving Student Performance using Self-Assessment Tests. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22, 46–52 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. DEDALO project, Assessment and Learning of Mathematics (January 23, 2012), http://dedalo.lcc.uma.es

  14. Khan, M.Y.: Theory & Problems in Financial Management. McGraw Hill Higher Education, Boston (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J., Pass, F.: Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10(3), 251–296 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gálvez, J., Guzmán, E., Conejo, R.: A SOA-Based Framework for Constructing Problem Solving Environments. In: ICALT 2008, pp. 126–127 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mitrovic, A., Weerasinghe, A.: Revisiting ill-definedness and the consequences for ITSs. In: 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 375–382 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Galvez Cordero, J., Guzman De Los Riscos, E., Conejo Muñoz, R. (2012). Exploring Quality of Constraints for Assessment in Problem Solving Environments. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7315. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30949-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30950-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics