Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the use of conversational agents to scaffold on-line collaborative learning discussions through an approach called academically productive talk. In contrast to past work, which has involved using agents to elevate the conceptual depth of collaborative discussion by leading students in groups through directed lines of reasoning, this approach lets students follow their own lines of reasoning and promotes productive practices such as explaining, stating agreement and disagreement, and reading and revoicing the statements of other students. We contrast two types of academically productive talk support for a discussion about 9th grade biology and show that one type in particular has a positive effect on the overall conversation, while the other is worse than no support. This positive effect carries over onto participation in a full-class discussion the following day. We use a sociolinguistic style analysis to investigate how the two types of support influence the discussion and draw conclusions for redesign. In particular, our findings have implications for how dynamic micro-scripting agents such as those scaffolding academically productive talk can be used in consort with more static macro- and micro- scripting.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adamson, D., Rosé, C.P.: Coordinating Multi-dimensional Support in Collaborative Conversational Agents. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, B. (eds.) ITS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7315, pp. 347–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Ai, H., Kumar, R., Nguyen, D., Nagasunder, A., Rosé, C.P.: Exploring the Effectiveness of Social Capabilities and Goal Alignment in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 134–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Berkowitz, M., Gibbs, J.: Measuring the developmental features of moral discussion. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 29, 399–410 (1983)
Chaudhuri, S., Kumar, R., Howley, I., Rosé, C.P.: Engaging Collaborative Learners with Helping Agents. Submitted to Artificial Intelligence in Education (2009)
Dyke, G., Lund, K., Girardot, J.-J.: Tatiana: an environment to support the CSCL analysis process. In: CSCL 2009, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 58–67 (2009)
Howley, I., Chaudhuri, S., Kumar, R., Rosé, C.P.: Motivation and Collaboration On-Line. Submitted to Artificial Intelligence in Education (2009)
Howley, I., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C.P.: Missing Something? Authority in Collaborative Learning. In: Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (2011)
Kumar, R., Rosé, C.P., Wang, Y.C., Joshi, M., Robinson, A.: Tutorial Dialogue as Adaptive Collaborative Learning Support. In: Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education (2007)
Kumar, R., Ai, H., Beuth, J.L., Rosé, C.P.: Socially Capable Conversational Tutors Can Be Effective in Collaborative Learning Situations. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 156–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Kumar, R., Rosé, C.P.: Architecture for building Conversational Agents that support Collaborative Learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies Special Issue on Intelligent and Innovative Support Systems for Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (in press)
Martin, J., White, P.: The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave (2005)
Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., Resnick, L.B.: Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education (2007)
Resnick, L.B., Bill, V., Lesgold, S.: Developing thinking abilities in arithmetic class. In: Demetriou, A., Shayer, M., Efklides, A. (eds.) Neo-Piagetian Theories of Cognitive Development: Implications and Applications for Education, pp. 210–230. Routledge, London (1992)
Resnick, L., O’Connor, C., Michaels, S.: Classroom Discourse, Mathematical Rigor, and Student Reasoning: An Accountable Talk Literature Review (2007)
Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education 46, 71–95 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dyke, G., Adamson, D., Howley, I., Penstein Rosé, C. (2012). Towards Academically Productive Talk Supported by Conversational Agents. In: Cerri, S.A., Clancey, W.J., Papadourakis, G., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7315. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_69
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_69
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30949-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30950-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)