Skip to main content

Initial Results from a Study on Personal Semantics of Conceptual Modeling Languages

  • Conference paper
Book cover Natural Language Processing and Information Systems (NLDB 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7337))

Abstract

In this paper we present the initial results from our longitudinal study into the personal semantics of common meta-concepts used in conceptual modeling. People have an implicit understanding of many of the meta-concepts used for modeling purposes, although these are rarely ever made explicit. We argue that a proper understanding of how modelers personally interpret the meta-concepts they use in nearly all of their (domain) models can aid in several things, e.g. explicating a modeler’s (proto)typical concept usage, finding communities that share a conceptual understanding and matching individual modelers to each other. Our initial results include the analysis of data resulting from our study so far and a discussion what hypotheses they support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aimé, X., Furst, F., Kuntz, P., Trichet, F.: Ontology Personalization: An Approach Based on Conceptual Prototypicality. In: Chen, L., Liu, C., Zhang, X., Wang, S., Strasunskas, D., Tomassen, S.L., Rao, J., Li, W.-S., Candan, K.S., Chiu, D.K.W., Zhuang, Y., Ellis, C.A., Kim, K.-H. (eds.) WCMT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5731, pp. 198–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Almeida, M.B.: A proposal to evaluate ontology content. Applied Ontology 4, 245–265 (2009)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayala, et al.: A comparative analysis of i*-based agent-oriented modeling languages. In: SEKE 2005, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 43–50 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Buuren, R., Gordijn, J., Janssen, W.: Business case modelling for e-services. In: 18 th Bled eConference eIntegration in Action (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dijkman, R.M., Quartel, D.A.C., van Sinderen, M.J.: Consistency in multi-viewpoint design of enterprise information systems. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(7-8), 737–752 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A.: Freezing language: conceptualisation processes across ICT-supported organisations. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katifori, V., Poggi, A., Scannapieco, M., Catarci, T., Ioannidis, Y.: Ontopim: how to rely on a personal ontology for personal information management. In: Proc. of the 1st Workshop on The Semantic Desktop. Citeseer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lankhorst, M.M.: Enterprise architecture modelling–the issue of integration. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18(4), 205–216 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. van der Linden, D.J.T., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Lartseva, A., Proper, H.A(E.): Towards an Investigation of the Conceptual Landscape of Enterprise Architecture. In: Halpin, T., Nurcan, S., Krogstie, J., Soffer, P., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Bider, I. (eds.) BPMDS 2011 and EMMSAD 2011. LNBIP, vol. 81, pp. 526–535. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Nuffel, D., Mulder, H., Van Kervel, S.: Enhancing the Formal Foundations of BPMN by Enterprise Ontology. In: Albani, A., Barjis, J., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds.) CIAO!/EOMAS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 34, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Perelman, C., Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press (June 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sowa, J.: The role of logic and ontology in language and reasoning. In: Poli, R., Seibt, J. (eds.) Theory and Applications of Ontology: Philosophical Perspectives, pp. 231–263. Springer, Netherlands (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Uschold, M.: Making the case for ontology. Applied Ontology (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Verhagen, T., Meents, S.: A framework for developing semantic differentials in is research: Assessing the meaning of electronic marketplace quality (emq). Serie Research Memoranda 0016, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilke, C., Demuth, B.: Uml is still inconsistent! how to improve ocl constraints in the uml 2.3 superstructure. Electronic Communications of the EASST 44 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van der Linden, D., Gaaloul, K., Molnar, W. (2012). Initial Results from a Study on Personal Semantics of Conceptual Modeling Languages. In: Bouma, G., Ittoo, A., Métais, E., Wortmann, H. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. NLDB 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7337. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31178-9_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31178-9_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31177-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31178-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics