Skip to main content

Improvements and Performance of Diagnostic Compositional Imaging Using a Novel Dual-Energy X-ray Technique

  • Conference paper
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7361))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2719 Accesses

Abstract

Determine whether or not improvements to the calibration procedure for a novel dual-energy x-ray mammography technique improve the uniformity, accuracy, and/or reproducibility of the measured breast composition. The long-term goal of this project is to develop a technique that will improve the specificity of mammography diagnosis. Energy dependent corrections for light-field, dark-field, and Heel effect were made for each measurement. A total of 20 women who were scheduled for additional imaging prior to biopsy underwent an additional dual-energy/low dose full-field digital mammography scan as part of a pilot study investigating the use of breast composition measures in mammography. The estimated water/lipid/protein content of suspicious lesions were measured. The modified x-ray calibration procedure resulted in over a 3-fold improvement in the uniformity of a flat-field calibration phantom with known breast density. Some preliminary results from women are available and show that different types of breast lesions have different compositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Murray, T., Xu, J., Smigal, C., Thun, M.J.: Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 56(2), 106–130 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Elmore, J.G., Barton, M.B., Moceri, V.M., Polk, S., Arena, P.J., Fletcher, S.W.: Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. N. Engl. J. Med. 338(16), 1089–1096 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dromain, C., Balleyguier, C., Adler, G., Garbay, J.R., Delaloge, S.: Contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur. J. Radiol. 69(1), 34–42 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mishkin, M.M.: Contrast media safety: what do we know and how do we know it? Am. J. Cardiol. 66(14), 34F–36F (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allison, D.B., Zannolli, R., Faith, M.S., Heo, M., Pietrobelli, A., VanItallie, T.B., Pi-Sunyer, F.X., Heymsfield, S.B.: Weight loss increases and fat loss decreases all-cause mortality rate: results from two independent cohort studies. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 23(6), 603–611 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Z.M., Heshka, S., Pierson Jr., R.N., Heymsfield, S.B.: Systematic organization of body-composition methodology: an overview with emphasis on component-based methods. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 61(3), 457–465 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heymsfield, S.B., Waki, M., Kehayias, J., Lichtman, S., Dilmanian, F.A., Kamen, Y., Wang, J., Pierson, R.N.: Chemical and Elemental Analysis of Humans Invivo Using Improved Body-Composition Models. American Journal of Physiology 261(2), E190–E198 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, J., Rico, D., Augustine, B., Mawdsley, G., Yaffe, M.: An optical method for measuring compressed breast thickness. In: 6th Int. Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 569–573 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michael, G.J., Henderson, C.J.: Monte Carlo modelling of an extended DXA technique. Phys. Med. Biol. 43(9), 2583–2596 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shepherd, J.A., Herve, L., Landau, J., Fan, B., Kerlikowske, K., Cummings, S.R.: Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density. Med. Phys. 33(5), 1490–1498 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laidevant, A., Malkov, S., Au, A., Shepherd, J.A.: Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Method Using a Full Field Digital Mammography System. In: Krupinski, E.A. (ed.) IWDM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5116, pp. 108–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Heinze, G., Schemper, M.: A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat. Med. 21(16), 2409–2419 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Duewer, F., Flowers, C.I., Kerlikowske, K., Malkov, S., Joe, B.N., Shepherd, J.A. (2012). Improvements and Performance of Diagnostic Compositional Imaging Using a Novel Dual-Energy X-ray Technique. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_73

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31270-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31271-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics