Skip to main content

Mammographic Parenchymal Texture Analysis for Estrogen-Receptor Subtype Specific Breast Cancer Risk Estimation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7361))

Abstract

We investigate the potential of mammographic parenchymal texture as a surrogate marker of the risk to develop Estrogen Receptor (ER) sub-type specific breast cancer. A case-control study was performed, including 118 cancer cases stratified by ER receptor status and 354 age-matched controls. Digital mammographic (DM) images were retrospectively collected and analyzed under HIPAA and IRB approval. The performance of the texture features was compared to that of the standard mammographic density measures. We observed that breast percent density PD% and parenchymal texture features can both distinguish between cancer cases and controls (A z > 0.70). However, for ER subtype-specific classification, PD% alone does not provide sufficient classification (A z = 0.60), while texture features have significant classification performance (A z = 0.70). Combining breast density with texture features achieves the best performance (A z = 0.71). These findings suggest that mammographic texture analysis may have value for sub-type specific breast cancer risk assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shelley Hwang, E., Chew, T., Shiboski, S., Farren, G., Benz, C.C., Wrensch, M.: Risk factors for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. ARCH SURG 140, 58–62 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Savage, L.: Researchers wonder why high-risk women are not taking chemoprevention drugs. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 99, 913–914 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aiello, E.J., Buist, D.S.M., White, E.: Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 14, 662–668 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd, N.F., Melnichouk, O., Martin, L.J., Hislop, G., Chiarelli, A.M., Yaffe, M.J., Minkin, S.: Mammographic density, response to hormones, and breast cancer risk. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 2985–2992 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heine, J.J., Malhotra, P.: Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis and digital mammography. part 1 tissue and related risk factors. Academic Radiology 9(3), 115–122 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li, H., Giger, M.L., Olopade, O.I., Margolis, A., Lan, L., Chinander, M.R.: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad. Radiol. 12(7), 863–873 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yerushalmi, R., Woods, R., Kennecke, H., Speers, C., Knowling, M., Gelmon, K.: Patterns of relapse in breast cancer: changes over time. Breast Cancer Res. Treat 120, 753–759 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nielsen, M., Karemore, G., Loog, M., Raundahl, J., Karssemeijer, N., Otten, J.D., Karsdal, M.A., Vachon, C.M., Christiansen, C.: A novel and automatic mammographic texture resemblance marker is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 35, 381–387 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karemore, G., Brandt, S., Sporring, J., Nielsen, M.: Anisotropic diffusion tensor applied to temporal mammograms: an application to breast cancer risk assessment. In: Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Young, R.A.: The gaussian derivative model for spatial vision: I. retinal mechanisms. Spat. Vis. 2(4), 273–293 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weickert, J.: Coherence-enhancing diffusion filtering. Int. J. Comput. Vision 31, 111–127 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karahaliou, A., Skiadopoulos, S., Boniatis, I., Sakellaropoulos, P., Likaki, E., Panayiotakis, G., Costaridou, L.: Texture analysis of tissue surrounding microcalcifications on mammograms for breast cancer diagnosis. Br. J. Radiol. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. van den Boomgaard, R.: Algorithms for non-linear diffusion. Technical report, Intelligent Sensory Information Systems, University of Amsterdam, Kruislaan 403, 1098 SJ Amsterdam,The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keller, B., Nathan, D., Wang, Y., Zheng, Y., Gee, J., Conant, E., Kontos, D.: Adaptive multi-cluster fuzzy c-means segmentation of breast parenchymal tissue in digital mammography. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 14(3), 562–569 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arya, S., Mount, D.M., Netanyahu, N.S., Silverman, R., Wu, A.Y.: An optimal algorithm for approximate nearest neighbor searching fixed dimensions. J. ACM 45, 891–923 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Geng, X., Liu, T.-Y., Qin, T., Li, H.: Feature Selection for Ranking, vol. (49), pp. 407–414. ACM Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. DeLong, E.R., DeLong, D.M., Clarke-Pearson, D.L.: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3), 837–845 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hanley, J.A., McNeil, B.J.: The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve. Radiology 143, 29–36 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ziv, E., Tice, J., Smith-Bindman, R., Shepherd, J., Cummings, S., Kerlikowske, K.: Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers Prevention 13(12), 2090–2095 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kostopoulos, S., Cavouras, D., Daskalakis, A., Kalatzis, I., Bougioukos, P., Kagadis, G.C., Ravazoula, P., Nikiforidis, G.: Assessing Estrogen Receptors’ Status by Texture Analysis of Breast Tissue Specimens and Pattern Recognition Methods. In: Kropatsch, W.G., Kampel, M., Hanbury, A. (eds.) CAIP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4673, pp. 221–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Hines, L.M., Risendal, B., Slattery, M.L.: Differences in estrogen receptor subtype according to family history of breast cancer among hispanic, but not non-hispanic white women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 17, 2700–2706 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karemore, G. et al. (2012). Mammographic Parenchymal Texture Analysis for Estrogen-Receptor Subtype Specific Breast Cancer Risk Estimation. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_77

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_77

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31270-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31271-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics