Abstract
Automatic classification of breast masses in mammograms has been considered a major challenge. Mass shape, margin and density define the malignancy level according to a standardized description, the BI-RADS lexicon. Unlike other approaches, we do not segment masses but instead, we attempt to describe entire regions. In this paper, continuos (Zernike) and discrete (Krawtchouk) orthogonal moments were used to characterize breast masses and their discriminant power to classify benign and malign masses, was assessed. Firstly, Regions of Interest selected by an expert are projected onto two sets of orthogonal polynomials functions, continuous and discrete, thereby drawing shape global information onto a feature space. Using a simple euclidean metric between vectors, the projected images are automatically classified as benign or malign by a k-nearest neighbor strategy. The parameter space is characterized using a set of 150 benign and 150 malign images. The whole method was assessed in a set of 100 masses with different shape and margins and the classification results were compared against a ground truth, already provided by the database. These results showed that discrete Krawtchouk outperformed Zernike moments, reaching an accuracy rate of 90,2% (compared to 81% for Zernike moments), while the area under the curve in a ROC evaluation yielded Az = 0.93 and Az = 0.85 for the Krawtchouk and Zernike strategies, respectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Society, A.C.: Cancer facts & figures 2008. Technical report, ACS (2008)
Buseman, S., Mouchawar, J., Calonge, N., Byers, T.: Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma. Cancer 97, 352–358 (2003)
ACR: Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston (1998)
Nishikawa, R.M.: Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 31, 224–235 (2007)
Mukundan, R., Ramakrishnan, K.R.: Moment Functions in Image Analysis: Theory and Applications. World Scientific, Singapore (1998)
Hu, M.K.: Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Transactions on Information Theory 8(2), 179–187 (1962)
Mukundan, R., Ong, S.H., Lee, P.A.: Image analysis by tchebichef moments. IEEE Trans. Image Process 10(9), 1357–1364 (2001)
Teague, M.R.: Image analysis via the general theory of moments. J. Optical Soc. Am. 70, 920–930 (1980)
Wee, C.Y., Paramesran, R.: On the computational aspects of zernike moments. Image and Vision Computing 25, 967–980 (2007)
Yin, J., Pierro, A., Wei, M.: Analysis for the reconstruction of a noisy signal based on orthogonal moments. Appl. Math. Comput. 132(2), 249–263 (2002)
Yap, P., Paramesran, R., Ong, S.: Image analysis by krawtchouk moments. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 12(11), 1367–1377 (2003)
Tahmasbi, A., Saki, F., Shokouhi, S.B.: Classification of benign and malignant masses based on zernike moments. Computers in Biology and Medicine 41, 726–735 (2011)
Oliver, A., Torrent, A., Llado, X., Marti, J.: Automatic diagnosis of masses by using level set segmentation and shape description. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 2528–2531 (2010)
Wei, C.H., Chen, S.Y., Liu, X.: Mammogram retrieval on similar mass lesions. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 3, 1–15 (2010)
AbuBaker, A.A., Qahwaji, R.S., Aqel, M.J., Saleh, M.H.: Mammogram image size reduction using 16-8 bit conversion technique. International Journal of Biological and Medical Sciences 2, 103–110 (2006)
Homer, M.J.: Mammographic Interpretation: A Practical Approach, 2nd edn., New York (1997)
Maggio, C.D.: State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 31(suppl.1), S56–S69 (2004)
Kim, H., Kim, J.: Region-based shape descriptor invariant to rotation, scale and translation. Signal Proc.: Image Communication 16, 87–93 (2000)
Narváez, F., Díaz, G., Romero, E.: Automatic BI-RADS Description of Mammographic Masses. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds.) IWDM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6136, pp. 673–681. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Moore, R., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: The digital database for screening mammography. In: Yaffe, M.J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pp. 212–218. Medical Physics Publishing (2001)
Makadia, A., Pavlovic, V., Kumar, S.: A New Baseline for Image Annotation. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P., Zisserman, A. (eds.) ECCV 2008, Part III. LNCS, vol. 5304, pp. 316–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Fawcett, T.: An introduction to roc analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 27, 861–874 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Narváez, F., Romero, E. (2012). Breast Mass Classification Using Orthogonal Moments. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31270-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31271-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)