Skip to main content

Hierarchical vs. Simultaneous Multiresolution Strategies for Nonrigid Image Registration

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7359))

Abstract

Nonrigid image registration algorithms commonly employ multiresolution strategies, both for the image and the transformation model. Usually a hierarchical approach is chosen: the algorithm starts on a level with reduced complexity, e.g. a smoothed and downsampled version of the input images, and with a limited number of degrees of freedom for the transformation. Gradually the level of complexity is increased until the original, non-smoothed images are used, and the transformation model has the highest degrees of freedom. In this study, we define two alternative approaches in which low- and high-resolution levels are considered simultaneously. An extensive experimental comparison study is performed, evaluating all possible combinations of multiresolution schemes for image data and transformation model. Publicly available CT lung data, with annotated landmarks, are used to quantify registration accuracy. It is shown that simultaneous multiresolution strategies can lead to more accurate registration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zitová, B., Flusser, J.: Image registration methods: a survey. Image and Vision Computing 21, 977–1000 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Holden, M.: A review of geometric transformations for nonrigid body registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 27, 111–128 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer, B., Modersitzki, J.: Ill-posed medicine - an introduction to image registration. Inverse Problems 24 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lester, H., Arridge, S.R.: A survey of hierarchical non-linear medical image registration. Pattern Recognition 32, 129–149 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L.I., Hayes, C., Hill, D.L.G., Leach, M.O., Hawkes, D.J.: Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: Application to breast MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 18, 712–721 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yin, Y., Hoffman, E.A., Ding, K., Reinhardt, J.M., Lin, C.-L.: A cubic B-spline-based hybrid registration of lung CT images for a dynamic airway geometric model with large deformation. Physics in Medicine and Biology 56, 203–218 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gholipour, A., Kehtarnavaz, N., Briggs, R., Devous, M., Gopinath, K.: Brain functional localization: A survey of image registration techniques. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 26, 427–451 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Risser, L., Vialard, F., Wolz, R., Murgasova, M., Holm, D.D., Rueckert, D.: Simultaneous multi-scale registration using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 30, 1746–1759 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole-Rhodes, A.A., Johnson, K.L., LeMoigne, J., Zavorin, I.: Multiresolution registration of remote sensing imagery by optimization of mutual information using a stochastic gradient. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 12, 1495–1511 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Metz, C.T., Klein, S., Schaap, M., van Walsum, T., Niessen, W.J.: Nonrigid registration of dynamic medical imaging data using nD+t B-splines and a groupwise optimization approach. Medical Image Analysis 15, 238–249 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mattes, D., Haynor, D.R., Vesselle, H., Lewellen, T.K., Eubank, W.: PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22, 120–128 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dinggang, S.: Fast image registration by hierarchical soft correspondence detection. Pattern Recognition 42, 954–961 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kybic, J., Unser, M.: Fast parametric elastic image registration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 12, 1427–1442 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Musse, O., Heitz, F., Armspach, J.P.: Topology preserving deformable image matching using constrained hierarchical parametric models. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 10, 1081–1093 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. van Stralen, M., Pluim, J.P.W.: Optimal discrete multi-resolution deformable image registration. In: 6th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 947–950 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Somayajula, S., Joshi, A.A., Leahy, R.M.: Mutual information based non-rigid mouse registration using a scale-space approach. In: 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, pp. 1147–1150 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klein, S., Staring, M., Murphy, K., Viergever, M.A., Pluim, J.P.W.: elastix: A toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 29, 196–205 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Klein, S., Pluim, J.P.W., Staring, M., Viergever, M.A.: Adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimisation for image registration. International Journal of Computer Vision 81, 227–239 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bertsekas, D.P.: Nonlinear Programming. Athena Scientific, Massachusetts (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Castillo, R., Castillo, E., Guerra, R., Johnson, V.E., McPhail, T., Garg, A.K., Guerrero, T.: A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets. Physics in Medicine and Biology 54, 1849–1870 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van de Kraats, E.B., Penney, G.P., Tomazevic, D., van Walsum, T., Niessen, W.J.: Standardized evaluation methodology for 2-D-3-D registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 24, 1177–1189 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sun, W., Niessen, W.J., Klein, S. (2012). Hierarchical vs. Simultaneous Multiresolution Strategies for Nonrigid Image Registration. In: Dawant, B.M., Christensen, G.E., Fitzpatrick, J.M., Rueckert, D. (eds) Biomedical Image Registration. WBIR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7359. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31340-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31340-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31339-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31340-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics