Skip to main content

Focus, Evidentiality and Soft Triggers

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language and Meaning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7218))

  • 1692 Accesses

Abstract

Soft triggers are fairly easily suspendable in context. Two main environments in which this happens have been identified: (a) The presupposition of soft triggers can be suspended by focus (cf. Beaver 2004) (b) Simons (2007) has observed that many soft triggers such as hear, see, believe, discover, know, etc. have semantically parenthetical uses which are not presuppositional. This paper offers a way of predicting these facts in the context of a theory applicable to soft triggers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, B.: Where have some of the presuppositions gone? In: Birner, B.J., Ward, G. (eds.) Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, pp. 1–20. John Benjamins, Philadelphia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrusán, M.: Triggering verbal presuppositions. In: Li, N., Lutz, D. (eds.) Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20, pp. 684–701. eLanguage (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrusán, M.: Predicting the Presuppositions of Soft Triggers. Linguistics and Philosophy (to appear, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Abusch, D.: Presupposition triggering from alternatives. Journal of Semantics 27(1), 37–80 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D.: Have you noticed that your belly button lint colour is related to the colour of your clothing? In: Bauerle, R., Reyle, U., Zimmerman, T.E. (eds.) Presupposition: Papers in Honor of Hans Kamp (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G., McConnell-Ginet, S.: Meaning and grammar: an introduction to semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Demolombe, R., Fariñas del Cerro, L.: Towards a logical characterization of sentences of the kind “sentence p is about object c”. In: Holdobler, S. (ed.) Intellectics and Computational Logic: Papers in Honor of Wolfgang Bibel. Kluwer Academic Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E.: Sensation and perception. Wadsworth Pub. Co. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Itti, L., Koch, C.: Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2(3), 194–203 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L.: Implicative verbs. Language 47(2), 340–358 (1971a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L.: Some Observations on Factivity. Papers in Linguistics 5, 55–69 (1971b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keshet, E.: Infinitival Complements. In: Gronn, A. (ed.) Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinedinst, N.: Totally Hardcore Semantic Presuppositions. ms. UCL (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusumoto, K.: On the quantification over times in natural language. Natural Language Semantics 13(4), 317–357 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navalpakkam, V., Itti, L.: Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research 45(2), 205–231 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.H.: Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy 70(18), 601–609 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romoli, J.: The presuppositions of soft triggers are not presuppositions. Talk presented at SALT 21 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, M.: On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In: Hastings, R., Jackson, B., Zvolensky, Z. (eds.) Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 11 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, M.: Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition. Lingua 117(6), 1034–1056 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, M., Tonhauser, J., Beaver, D., Roberts, C.: What projects and why. In: Li, N., Lutz, D. (eds.) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 20, pp. 309–327. Ithaca, Cornell (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., Wilson, D.: Ordered entailments: An alternative to presuppositional theories. In: Syntax and Semantics XI: Presupposition, pp. 299–323 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.C.: Pragmatic presuppositions. Semantics and Philosophy, 197–214 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abrusán, M. (2012). Focus, Evidentiality and Soft Triggers. In: Aloni, M., Kimmelman, V., Roelofsen, F., Sassoon, G.W., Schulz, K., Westera, M. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7218. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31481-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31482-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics