Skip to main content

Badger: A Regression Planner to Resolve Design Model Inconsistencies

  • Conference paper
Book cover Modelling Foundations and Applications (ECMFA 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7349))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One of the main challenges in model-driven software engineering is to deal with design model inconsistencies. Automated techniques to detect and resolve these inconsistencies are essential. We propose to use the artificial intelligence technique of automated planning for the purpose of resolving software model inconsistencies. We implemented a regression planner in Prolog and validated it on the resolution of different types of structural inconsistencies for generated models of varying sizes. We discuss the scalability results of the approach obtained through several stress-tests and discuss the limitations of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almeida da Silva, M.A., Mougenot, A., Blanc, X., Bendraou, R.: Towards Automated Inconsistency Handling in Design Models. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 348–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Blanc, X., Mougenot, A., Mounier, I., Mens, T.: Detecting model inconsistency through operation-based model construction. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. Software Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 511–520 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bratko, I.: Prolog programming for artificial intelligence. Addison-Wesley (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demsky, B., Rinard, M.C.: Automatic detection and repair of errors in data structures. In: Int’l Conf. on Object Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications, pp. 78–95. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Egyed, A.: Automatically detecting and tracking inconsistencies in software design models. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 37(2), 188–204 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Egyed, A., Letier, E., Finkelstein, A.: Generating and evaluating choices for fixing inconsistencies in UML design models. In: Proc. Int’l Conf. Automated Software Engineering, pp. 99–108. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffmann, J.: FF: The Fast-Forward Planning System. The AI Magazine (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hoffmann, J., Nebel, B.: The FF Planning System: Fast plan generation through heuristic search. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14, 253–302 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiménez Celorrio, S.: Planning and Learning under Uncertainty. PhD thesis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jose, M., Majumdar, R.: Cause clue clauses: error localization using maximum satisfiability. In: Proc. Conf. on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pp. 437–446. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Küster, J.M., Ryndina, K.: Improving Inconsistency Resolution with Side-Effect Evaluation and Costs. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 136–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Mani, S., Sinha, V.S., Dhoolia, P., Sinha, S.: Automated support for repairing input-model faults. In: Int’l Conf. on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 195–204. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mens, T., Van Der Straeten, R.: Incremental Resolution of Model Inconsistencies. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Schobbens, P.-Y. (eds.) WADT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4409, pp. 111–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2007), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71998-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Mens, T., Van Der Straeten, R., D’Hondt, M.: Detecting and Resolving Model Inconsistencies Using Transformation Dependency Analysis. In: Wang, J., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 200–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mougenot, A., Darrasse, A., Blanc, X., Soria, M.: Uniform Random Generation of Huge Metamodel Instances. In: Paige, R.F., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 130–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Nentwich, C., Emmerich, W., Finkelstein, A.: Consistency management with repair actions. In: Proc. 25th Int’l Conf. Software Engineering, pp. 455–464. IEEE Computer Society (May 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Object Management Group. Unified Modeling Language: Superstructure version 2.3. formal/2010-05-05 (May 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pinna Puissant, J., Mens, T., Van Der Straeten, R.: Resolving model inconsistencies with automated planning. In: 3rd Workshop on Living with Inconsistencies in Software Development. CEUR Workshop Proceeding (September 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Spanoudakis, G., Zisman, A.: Inconsistency management in software engineering: Survey and open research issues. In: Handbook of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 329–380. World Scientific (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Van Der Straeten, R.: Inconsistency management in model-driven engineering: an approach using description logics. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Der Straeten, R., Mens, T., Simmonds, J., Jonckers, V.: Using Description Logic to Maintain Consistency between UML Models. In: Stevens, P., Whittle, J., Booch, G. (eds.) UML 2003. LNCS, vol. 2863, pp. 326–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Der Straeten, R., Mens, T., Van Baelen, S.: Challenges in Model-Driven Software Engineering. In: Chaudron, M.R.V. (ed.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5421, pp. 35–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Der Straeten, R., Pinna Puissant, J., Mens, T.: Assessing the Kodkod Model Finder for Resolving Model Inconsistencies. In: France, R.B., Kuester, J.M., Bordbar, B., Paige, R.F. (eds.) ECMFA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6698, pp. 69–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiong, Y., Hu, Z., Zhao, H., Song, H., Takeichi, M., Mei, H.: Supporting automatic model inconsistency fixing. In: Proc. ESEC/FSE 2009, pp. 315–324. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pinna Puissant, J., Van Der Straeten, R., Mens, T. (2012). Badger: A Regression Planner to Resolve Design Model Inconsistencies. In: Vallecillo, A., Tolvanen, JP., Kindler, E., Störrle, H., Kolovos, D. (eds) Modelling Foundations and Applications. ECMFA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7349. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31491-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31491-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31490-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31491-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics