Skip to main content

Causality in the Context of Multiple Agents

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7393))

Abstract

The formal definition of causality raises non trivial issues in the case of several agents acting together. Several action operators are defined in the semantics of a multi modal logic. The approach which is proposed is an extension to several agents of the ”bringing it about” operators. A joint action operator is defined which holds the property of non monotonicity with respect to sets of agents. It is refined in a restricted joint operator for cases where several sets of agents cause independently a state of affairs and it is extended to sets of agents who are acting indirectly.

The formal definitions are evaluated with respect to several typical case studies and a detailed comparison with other approaches based on the STIT operators is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agotnes, T., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: On the logic of coalitional games. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems. Association for Computing Machinery (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aqvist, L.: Old foundations for the logic of agency and action. Studia Logica 72 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Broeersen, J., Herzig, A., Troquard, N.: Normal Coalition Logic and its conformant extension. In: Samet, D. (ed.) Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge. Presses Universitaires de Louvain (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carmo, J.: Collective agency, direct action and dynamic operators. Logic Journal of the IGPL 18(1), 66–98 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Carmo, J., Pacheco, O.: Deontic and action logics for organized collective agency, modeled through institutionalized agents and roles. Fundamenta Informaticae 48, 129–163 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chellas, B.F.: On bringing it about. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chellas, B.F.: Modal Logic: An introduction. Cambridge University Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Demolombe, R.: Relationships between obligations and actions in the context of institutional agents, human agents or software agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Law 19(2) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Demolombe, R., Jones, A.J.: Actions and normative positions. A modal-logical approach. In: Jacquette, D. (ed.) Companion to Philosophical Logic. Blackwell (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harel, D.: Dynamic logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2. Reidel (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hilpinen, R.: On Action and Agency. In: Ejerhed, E., Lindstrom, S. (eds.) Logic, Action and Cognition: Essays in Philosophical Logic. Kluwer (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Horty, J.: Agency and deontic logic. Oxford University Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horty, J.F., Belnap, N.: The deliberative STIT: a study of action, omission, ability, and obligation. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24, 583–644 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindahl, L.: Position and Change- A Study in Law and Logic. Synthese Library, vol. 112. D. Reidel (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lorini, E., Schwarzentruber, F.: A logic for reasoning about counterfactual emotions. Artificial Intelligence 175, 814–847 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pauly, M.: A modal logic for coalitional power in games. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(1), 149–166 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pörn, I.: Action Theory and Social Science. Some Formal Models. Synthese Library, vol. 120 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Santos, F., Carmo, J.: Indirect Action, Influence and Responsibility. In: Brown, M., Carmo, J. (eds.) Deontic Logic, Agency and Normative Systems, Workshops in Computing Series. Springer (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Segerberg, K.: Outline of a logic of action. In: Wolter, F., Wansing, H., de Rijke, W., Zakharyaschev, M. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 3. World Scientific Publishing Co. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sergot, M.: The logic of unwitting collective agency. Technical report 2088/6, Imperial College, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. von Wright, G.H.: Norm and Action. Routledge and Kegan (1963)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Demolombe, R. (2012). Causality in the Context of Multiple Agents. In: Ågotnes, T., Broersen, J., Elgesem, D. (eds) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. DEON 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7393. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31570-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31570-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31569-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31570-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics