Skip to main content

On Sequent Systems and Resolution for QBFs

  • Conference paper
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2012 (SAT 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7317))

Abstract

Quantified Boolean formulas generalize propositional formulas by admitting quantifications over propositional variables. We compare proof systems with different quantifier handling paradigms for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) with respect to their ability to allow succinct proofs. We analyze cut-free sequent systems extended by different quantifier rules and show that some rules are better than some others.

Q-resolution is an elegant extension of propositional resolution to QBFs and is applicable to formulas in prenex conjunctive normal form. In Q-resolution, there is no explicit handling of quantifiers by specific rules. Instead the forall reduction rule which operates on single clauses inspects the global quantifier prefix. We show that there are classes of formulas for which there are short cut-free tree proofs in a sequent system, but any Q-resolution refutation of the negation of the formula is exponential.

The work was partially supported by the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) under grant S11409-N23. We thank the referees for valuable comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balabanov, V., Jiang, J.-H.R.: Resolution Proofs and Skolem Functions in QBF Evaluation and Applications. In: Gopalakrishnan, G., Qadeer, S. (eds.) CAV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6806, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Buss, S.: An introduction to proof theory. In: Handbook of Proof Theory, pp. 1–78. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Clote, P., Kranakis, E.: Boolean Functions and Models of Computation. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, S.A., Morioka, T.: Quantified propositional calculus and a second-order theory for NC1. Arch. Math. Log. 44(6), 711–749 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, S.A., Reckhow, R.A.: On the lengths of proofs in the propositional calculus (preliminary version). In: STOC, pp. 135–148 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Egly, U., Seidl, M., Woltran, S.: A solver for QBFs in negation normal form. Constraints 14(1), 38–79 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gentzen, G.: Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. Mathematische Zeitschrift 39, 176–210, 405–431 (1935)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Haken, A.: The intractability of resolution. Theor. Comput. Sci. 39, 297–308 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jussila, T., Biere, A., Sinz, C., Kroning, D., Wintersteiger, C.M.: A First Step Towards a Unified Proof Checker for QBF. In: Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.A. (eds.) SAT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4501, pp. 201–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kleine Büning, H., Karpinski, M., Flögel, A.: Resolution for quantified Boolean formulas. Inf. Comput. 117(1), 12–18 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Krajíček, J.: Bounded Arithmetic, Propositional Logic, and Complexity Theory. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Application, vol. 60. Cambridge University Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Plaisted, D.A., Greenbaum, S.: A structure-preserving clause form translation. J. Symb. Comput. 2(3), 293–304 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Tseitin, G.S.: On the Complexity of Derivation in Propositional Calculus. In: Slisenko, A.O. (ed.) Studies in Constructive Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, Part II. Seminars in Mathematics, vol. 8, pp. 234–259. Steklov Mathematical Institute, Leningrad (1968)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Egly, U. (2012). On Sequent Systems and Resolution for QBFs. In: Cimatti, A., Sebastiani, R. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2012. SAT 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7317. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31612-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31612-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31611-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31612-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics