Abstract
Quantified Boolean formulas generalize propositional formulas by admitting quantifications over propositional variables. We compare proof systems with different quantifier handling paradigms for quantified Boolean formulas (QBFs) with respect to their ability to allow succinct proofs. We analyze cut-free sequent systems extended by different quantifier rules and show that some rules are better than some others.
Q-resolution is an elegant extension of propositional resolution to QBFs and is applicable to formulas in prenex conjunctive normal form. In Q-resolution, there is no explicit handling of quantifiers by specific rules. Instead the forall reduction rule which operates on single clauses inspects the global quantifier prefix. We show that there are classes of formulas for which there are short cut-free tree proofs in a sequent system, but any Q-resolution refutation of the negation of the formula is exponential.
The work was partially supported by the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) under grant S11409-N23. We thank the referees for valuable comments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Balabanov, V., Jiang, J.-H.R.: Resolution Proofs and Skolem Functions in QBF Evaluation and Applications. In: Gopalakrishnan, G., Qadeer, S. (eds.) CAV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6806, pp. 149–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Buss, S.: An introduction to proof theory. In: Handbook of Proof Theory, pp. 1–78. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1998)
Clote, P., Kranakis, E.: Boolean Functions and Models of Computation. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Cook, S.A., Morioka, T.: Quantified propositional calculus and a second-order theory for NC1. Arch. Math. Log. 44(6), 711–749 (2005)
Cook, S.A., Reckhow, R.A.: On the lengths of proofs in the propositional calculus (preliminary version). In: STOC, pp. 135–148 (1974)
Egly, U., Seidl, M., Woltran, S.: A solver for QBFs in negation normal form. Constraints 14(1), 38–79 (2009)
Gentzen, G.: Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. Mathematische Zeitschrift 39, 176–210, 405–431 (1935)
Haken, A.: The intractability of resolution. Theor. Comput. Sci. 39, 297–308 (1985)
Jussila, T., Biere, A., Sinz, C., Kroning, D., Wintersteiger, C.M.: A First Step Towards a Unified Proof Checker for QBF. In: Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.A. (eds.) SAT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4501, pp. 201–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Kleine Büning, H., Karpinski, M., Flögel, A.: Resolution for quantified Boolean formulas. Inf. Comput. 117(1), 12–18 (1995)
Krajíček, J.: Bounded Arithmetic, Propositional Logic, and Complexity Theory. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Application, vol. 60. Cambridge University Press (1995)
Plaisted, D.A., Greenbaum, S.: A structure-preserving clause form translation. J. Symb. Comput. 2(3), 293–304 (1986)
Tseitin, G.S.: On the Complexity of Derivation in Propositional Calculus. In: Slisenko, A.O. (ed.) Studies in Constructive Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, Part II. Seminars in Mathematics, vol. 8, pp. 234–259. Steklov Mathematical Institute, Leningrad (1968)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Egly, U. (2012). On Sequent Systems and Resolution for QBFs. In: Cimatti, A., Sebastiani, R. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2012. SAT 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7317. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31612-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31612-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31611-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31612-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)