Skip to main content

Coherence for Uncertainty Measures Given through ⊕-Basic Assignments Ruled by General Operations

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Computational Intelligence (IPMU 2012)

Abstract

In order to deal with partial assessments and their extensions, we give a characterization of some measures (such as capacities, belief functions, possibilities) in terms of basic assignments ruled by a general operation ⊕. The notion of coherence introduced by de Finetti in the probabilistic setting is generalized to non additive measures and we study the upper and lower envelopes of all possible extensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baioletti, M., Coletti, G., Petturiti, D., Vantaggi, B.: Inferential models and relevant algorithms in a possibilistic framework. Inter. J. of Approximate Reasoning 52(5), 580–598 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chateauneuf, A., Jaffray, J.Y.: Some characterizations of lower probabilities and other monotone capacities through the use of Mobius inversion. Mathematical Social Sciences 17(3), 263–283 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R.: From conditional events to conditional measures: a new axiomatic approach. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 32, 373–392 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R.: Probabilistic Logic in a Coherent Setting. Trends in Logic, vol. 15. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R.: Toward a general theory of conditional beliefs. Int. J. of Intelligent Systems 21, 229–259 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R., Vantaggi, B.: Possibility measures through a probabilistic inferential process. In: Proc. Int. Conf. of NAFIPS. IEEE CN: CFP08750-CDR Omnipress, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R., Vantaggi, B.: Inferential processes leading to possibility and necessity. Submitted to Information Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coletti, G., Vantaggi, B.: T-conditional possibilities: coherence and inference. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160(3), 306–324 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. de Finetti, B.: Problemi determinati e indeterminati nel calcolo delle probabilitá. Rendiconti della R.Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 12, 367–373 (1930)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. de Cooman, G., Aeyels, D.: Supremum-preserving upper probabilities. Information Sciences 118, 173–212 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. de Cooman, G., Miranda, E., Couso, I.: Lower previsions induced by multi-valued mappings. J. of Statistical Planning and Inference 133, 173–197 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. de Cooman, G., Troffaes, M., Miranda, E.: n-monotone lower previsions. J. of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 16(4), 253–263 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Denneberg, D.: Non-Additive Measure and Integral. Kluwer, Berlin (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: When upper probabilities are possibility measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49, 65–74 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Grabisch, M.: k-order additive discrete fuzzy measures and their representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 92(2), 167–189 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Halpern, J.: Reasoning about uncertainty. The MIT Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mesiar, R.: k-order additivity and maxitivity. Atti Sem. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena 51, 179–189 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Walley, P.: Statistical reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Coletti, G., Scozzafava, R., Vantaggi, B. (2012). Coherence for Uncertainty Measures Given through ⊕-Basic Assignments Ruled by General Operations. In: Greco, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Coletti, G., Fedrizzi, M., Matarazzo, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. IPMU 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 300. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31724-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31724-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31723-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31724-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics