Skip to main content

Image Quality Assessment Based on Distortion-Aware Decision Fusion

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Science and Intelligent Data Engineering (IScIDE 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7202))

Abstract

Generic image quality (IQ) metrics based on individual features are not capable of making accurate prediction across different distortion types. In this paper, we propose a two-stage scheme to overcome this limitation. At the first stage, the image distortion type is predicted by support-vector classifiers. At the second stage, decision-level fusion of three existing IQ metrics are conducted based on the k-nearest-neighbor (k-NN) regression where the acquired distortion-type knowledge is employed. When evaluated on the largest publicly-available IQ database which involves a large variety of distortion types, the proposed approach demonstrates impressive accuracy and robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Okarma, K.: Combined Full-Reference Image Quality Metric Linearly Correlated with Subjective Assessment. In: Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6113, pp. 539–546. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Larson, E.C., Chandler, D.M.: Most Apparent Distortion: Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment and the Role of Strategy. J. Electron. Imaging 19(1), 011006 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Falk, T.H., Guo, Y., Chan, W.Y.: Improving Robustness of Image Quality Measurement with Degradation Classification and Machine Learning. In: 41st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, pp. 503–507 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, M., Yang, X.: Image Quality Assessment by Decision Fusion. IEICE Electronics Express 5(15), 537–542 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsu, C., Lin, C.: A Comparison of Methods for Multiclass Support Vector Machines. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks 13(2), 415–425 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MeTriX MuX Visual Quality Assessment Package, http://foulard.ece.cornell.edu/gaubatz/metrix_mux/

  7. Chang, C.W., Lin, C.J.: LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. ACM Trans. on Intell. Syst. Technol. 2(3), 27 (2011), Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ponomarenko, N., Battisti, F., Egiazarian, K., Astola, J., Lukin, V.: Metrics Performance Comparison for Color Image Database. In: 4th International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics, Scottsdale (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ponomarenko, N., Lukin, V., Zelensky, A., Egiazarian, K., Carli, M., Battisti, F.: TID 2008 - A Database for Evaluation of Full-Reference Visual Quality Assessment Metrics. Advances of Modern Radioelectronics 10, 30–45 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Damera-Venkata, N., Kite, T.D., Geisler, W.S., Evans, B.L., Bovik, A.C.: Image Quality Assessment Based on a Degradation Model. IEEE Trans. on Image Process. 9(4), 636–650 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitsa, T., Varkur, K.L.: Evaluation of Contrast Sensitivity Functions for the Formulation of Quality Measures Incorporated in Halftoning Algorithms. In: 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Minneapolis, pp. 301–304 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chandler, D.M., Hemami, S.S.: VSNR: A Wavelet-based Visual Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Natural Images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16(9), 2284–2298 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C.: Image Information and Visual Quality. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(2), 43–444 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C., de Veciana, G.: An Information Fidelity Criterion for Image Quality Assessment using Natural Scene Statistics. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14(12), 2117–2128 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: A Universal Image Quality Index. IEEE Signal Process. Letters 9(3), 81–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, W., Kuo, C.C.J.: Perceptual Visual Quality Metrics: A Survey. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 22(4), 297–312 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E.P., Bovik, A.C.: Multi-Scale Structural Similarity for Image Quality Assessment. In: Proc. 37th IEEE Asilomar Conf. on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peng, P., Li, Z. (2012). Image Quality Assessment Based on Distortion-Aware Decision Fusion. In: Zhang, Y., Zhou, ZH., Zhang, C., Li, Y. (eds) Intelligent Science and Intelligent Data Engineering. IScIDE 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7202. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31919-8_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31919-8_82

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31918-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31919-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics