Abstract
This paper discusses two important results about expressive limitations of elementary languages due to David Kaplan, and clarifies how they relate to the expressive power of plural constructions of natural languages. Kaplan proved that such plural quantifications as the following cannot be paraphrased into elementary languages:
Most things are funny. (1)
Some critics admire only one another. (2)
The proof that (1) cannot be paraphrased into elementary languages is often taken to support the generalized quantifier approach to natural languages, and the proof that (2) cannot be so paraphrased is usually taken to mean that (2) is a second-order sentence. The paper presents an alternative interpretation: Kaplan’s results provide important steps toward clarifying the expressive power of plural constructions of natural languages vis-à-vis their singular cousins. In doing so, the paper compares and contrasts (regimented) plural languages with generalized quantifier languages, and plural logic with second-order logic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Almog, J.: The complexity of marketplace logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 545–569 (1997)
Barwise, J., Cooper, R.: Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219 (1981)
Boolos, G.: To be is to be a value of a variable (or to be some values of some variables). Journal of Philosophy 81, 430–449 (1984)
Ebbinghaus, H.-D., Flum, J.: Finite Model Theory, 2nd revised edn. Springer, Berlin (1999)
Fagin, R.: Finite-model theory – a personal perspective. Theoretical Computer Science 116, 3–31 (1993)
Kaplan, D.: Rescher’s plurality-quantification (Abstract). Journal of Symbolic Logic 31, 153–154 (1966)
Kaplan, D.: Generalized plurality quantification (Abstract). Journal of Symbolic Logic 31, 154–155 (1966)
Keenan, E.L., Stavi, J.: A semantic characterization of natural language determiners. Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253–326 (1986)
McKay, T.: Plural Predication. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
Mostowski, A.: On a generalization of quantifiers. Fundamenta Mathematicae 44, 12–36 (1957)
Quine, W.V.: Methods of Logic, 3rd edn. London, RKP (1974)
Rescher, N.: Plurality-quantification (Abstract). Journal of Symbolic Logic 27, 373–374 (1962)
Rescher, N.: Plurality quantification revisited. Philosophical Inquiry 26, 1–6 (2004)
Väänänen, J.: A Short Course on Finite Model Theory. Manuscript Based on Lectures in 1993-1994 (1994), http://www.math.helsinki.fi/logic/people/jouko.vaananen/shortcourse.pdf
Westerståhl, D.: Logical constants in quantifier languages. Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 387–413 (1985)
Westerståhl, D.: Quantifiers in formal and natural languages. In: Gabbay, D., Guethner, F. (eds.) The Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. IV, pp. 1–131. Reidel, Dordrecht (1989)
Yi, B.-U.: Is two a property? Journal of Philosophy 95, 163–190 (1999)
Yi, B.-U.: Understanding the Many. Routledge, New York & London (2002)
Yi, B.-U.: The logic and meaning of plurals. Part I. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34, 459–506 (2005)
Yi, B.-U.: The logic and meaning of plurals. Part II. Journal of Philosophical Logic 35, 239–288 (2006)
Yi, B.-U.: Is logic axiomatizable? unpublished manuscript
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yi, BU. (2012). Plural Quantifications and Generalized Quantifiers. In: de Groote, P., Nederhof, MJ. (eds) Formal Grammar. FG FG 2010 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7395. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32024-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32024-8_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32023-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32024-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)